The use of expert opinion evidence in criminal proceedings: an updated framework
The 2012 amendments to the Evidence Act2 “significantly broadened the admissibility criteria for expert evidence”;3 at the same time, the judicial discretion to deny admissibility of relevant expert opinion evidence was also introduced. This article considers the key developments pre- and post-amend...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | CHEN, Siyuan, KOH, Zhi Jia, SOON, Jian Wei Joel |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3437 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5395/viewcontent/9298__2021__SAL_Prac_27_The_Use_of_Expert_Evidence_in_Criminal_Proceedings__Published_on_21_September_2021___1_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Improperly obtained evidence in criminal proceedings: An updated framework
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2022) -
The use of similar fact in criminal proceedings: An updated framework
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2020) -
The use of hearsay in criminal proceedings: An updated framework
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Disclosure in criminal proceedings: Developments and issues ahead
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2022) -
Criminal procedure in Singapore and Malaysia
by: TAN, Yock Lin, et al.
Published: (2014)