To stay or not to stay? A clash of arbitration and insolvency regimes
In the wake of the global Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a rise in creditorinitiated winding-up proceedings is likely to be impending in coming years (See e.g., RCMA Asia Pte. Ltd. v. Sun Electric Power Pte. Ltd. [2020] SGHC 205). At the same time, geopolitical developments, such as t...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | CHAN, Darius, SIDHARRTH B RAJAGOPAL |
---|---|
التنسيق: | text |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2021
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3447 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5405/viewcontent/JOIA_38_0402.pdf |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Should claims on a bill of exchange be stayed in favour of arbitration?
بواسطة: LAU, Kwan Ho
منشور في: (2014) -
Myanmar enacts modern arbitration regime
بواسطة: CHAN, Darius
منشور في: (2016) -
Stay of proceedings on dishonoured cheques
بواسطة: CHAN, Darius
منشور في: (2013) -
Singapore Apex Court lays down clear framework for arbitrability of insolvency-related claims
بواسطة: CHAN, Darius
منشور في: (2011) -
Recourse against an international arbitration award made in Singapore
بواسطة: CHAN, Darius
منشور في: (2012)