Is Article 16(3) of the Model Law a ‘one-shot remedy’ for non-participating respondents in international arbitrations?
It is not uncommon for practitioners acting for claimants in an arbitration to encounter a respondent who chooses to boycott the arbitral process. In cases involving such “non-participating” respondents, what are the rights and obligations of each party? Specifically, insofar as Model Law jurisdicti...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | text |
| 語言: | English |
| 出版: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3041 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4999/viewcontent/Is_Article_16_3__of_the_Model_Law_a_One_Shot_Remedy_for_Non_Participating_Respondents_in_International_Arbitrations____The_Singapore_Law_Gazette.pdf |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 機構: | Singapore Management University |
| 語言: | English |