Is Article 16(3) of the Model Law a ‘one-shot remedy’ for non-participating respondents in international arbitrations?
It is not uncommon for practitioners acting for claimants in an arbitration to encounter a respondent who chooses to boycott the arbitral process. In cases involving such “non-participating” respondents, what are the rights and obligations of each party? Specifically, insofar as Model Law jurisdicti...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHAN, Darius |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3041 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/4999/viewcontent/Is_Article_16_3__of_the_Model_Law_a_One_Shot_Remedy_for_Non_Participating_Respondents_in_International_Arbitrations____The_Singapore_Law_Gazette.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The law and theory of international commercial arbitration in Singapore
by: CHAN, Darius, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Remedies in International Law (Uniformity in International Commercial Arbitration)
by: FURMSTON, Michael Philip
Published: (1998) -
Interpreting contracts under Singapore law in international arbitration
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2016) -
Recourse against an international arbitration award made in Singapore
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2012) -
Singapore's International Arbitration Act 2012 vs Hong Kong's Arbitration Ordinance 2011
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2012)