The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law

For much of the European integration process, local authorities have been on the legal margins. Yet many amongst this group, and cities in particular, consider themselves as important players in realising the Union’s overarching policy objectives. This view is slowly but surely fi nding traction wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: VISSER, De Maartje
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3458
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5416/viewcontent/7JIntlCompL389_pvoa.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5416
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-54162022-01-13T07:43:09Z The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law VISSER, De Maartje For much of the European integration process, local authorities have been on the legal margins. Yet many amongst this group, and cities in particular, consider themselves as important players in realising the Union’s overarching policy objectives. This view is slowly but surely fi nding traction with the EU’s political institutions. This article suggests that the future architecture of the European Union’s (EU’s) operating system will evince a rapprochement between the socio-economic clout of local authorities, notably cities, and their legal-political recognition at Union level. It further suggests that there is room for greater conceptual clarity along two lines when interrogating the future of the vertical axis of the Union’s governance structure. First, the local tier should be disaggregated, with cities treated as a distinct subset of the category of subnational authorities that warrant attention in their own right. Second, the relationship between the EU and cities should be dissected further to develop a more fi ne-grained map of the possible ways in which both levels interact and the norms and incentives that shape those interactions. To this end, a six-fold taxonomy is developed that covers cities in their guise as (i) implementation agents; (ii) value communities; (iii) front-line decisionmakers; (iv) democracy enhancers; (v) policy developers; and (vi) advocates of urban interests in EU decision-making. Finally, this article addresses the methodological implications of an urban turn in European legal scholarship. 2020-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3458 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5416/viewcontent/7JIntlCompL389_pvoa.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University local authorities cities implementation agents value communities local democracy policy-making urban interests European Law Urban Studies
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic local authorities
cities
implementation agents
value communities
local democracy
policy-making
urban interests
European Law
Urban Studies
spellingShingle local authorities
cities
implementation agents
value communities
local democracy
policy-making
urban interests
European Law
Urban Studies
VISSER, De Maartje
The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law
description For much of the European integration process, local authorities have been on the legal margins. Yet many amongst this group, and cities in particular, consider themselves as important players in realising the Union’s overarching policy objectives. This view is slowly but surely fi nding traction with the EU’s political institutions. This article suggests that the future architecture of the European Union’s (EU’s) operating system will evince a rapprochement between the socio-economic clout of local authorities, notably cities, and their legal-political recognition at Union level. It further suggests that there is room for greater conceptual clarity along two lines when interrogating the future of the vertical axis of the Union’s governance structure. First, the local tier should be disaggregated, with cities treated as a distinct subset of the category of subnational authorities that warrant attention in their own right. Second, the relationship between the EU and cities should be dissected further to develop a more fi ne-grained map of the possible ways in which both levels interact and the norms and incentives that shape those interactions. To this end, a six-fold taxonomy is developed that covers cities in their guise as (i) implementation agents; (ii) value communities; (iii) front-line decisionmakers; (iv) democracy enhancers; (v) policy developers; and (vi) advocates of urban interests in EU decision-making. Finally, this article addresses the methodological implications of an urban turn in European legal scholarship.
format text
author VISSER, De Maartje
author_facet VISSER, De Maartje
author_sort VISSER, De Maartje
title The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law
title_short The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law
title_full The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law
title_fullStr The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law
title_full_unstemmed The future is urban: The progressive renaissance of the city in EU law
title_sort future is urban: the progressive renaissance of the city in eu law
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3458
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5416/viewcontent/7JIntlCompL389_pvoa.pdf
_version_ 1770576003810197504