Improperly obtained evidence in criminal proceedings: An updated framework
The 2012 amendments to the Evidence Act “significantly broadened the admissibility criteria for expert evidence”; at the same time, the judicial discretion to deny admissibility of relevant expert opinion evidence was also introduced. This article considers the key developments pre- and post-amendme...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | CHEN, Siyuan, KOH, Zhi Jia, SOON, Jian Wei Joel |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3701 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5659/viewcontent/ExpertOpinion_SALPrac_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The use of expert opinion evidence in criminal proceedings: an updated framework
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Evidence and Criminal Procedure: Gradual Developments Towards Clarity in a Maze of Statutory Enactments
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2015) -
Evidence and Criminal Procedure
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2013) -
2018 Changes to the Evidence Act and Criminal Procedure Code - The Criminal Justice Reform Bill and Evidence (Amendment) Bill
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Reliability and Relevance as the Touchstones for Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Muhammad bin Kadar v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 [Case Note]
by: CHEN, Siyuan
Published: (2012)