Why an independent, holistic review of the Parti Liyani case is necessary
In a commentary, SMU Associate Professor of Law Eugene Tan discussed the case of Parti Liyani versus Public Prosecutor, and explained why an independent, holistic review of the case is necessary.
Saved in:
Main Author: | EUGENE, Tan K. B. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3811 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5769/viewcontent/20200922_todayonline_opinion_why.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
The Supreme Court and the Hamiltonian Dilemma
by: DAM, Shubhankar
Published: (2007) -
The High Court as de facto Court Of Appeal: A revisitation of leave requirements in the criminal and family court jurisdictions
by: LAU, Kwan Ho
Published: (2019) -
Pakistani Supreme Court and Constitutional Space
by: DAM, Shubhankar
Published: (2007) -
Recent developments in the offer to settle regime in Singapore: Accepting an offer to settle before damages are assessed and the Contra Proferentem Rule: Ong & Ong Pte Ltd v Fairview Developments Pte Ltd [2014] 2 SLR 1285
by: CHEN, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2014) -
The Right to Appeal Against a Decision Made on an Interlocutory Application: The Immediate Aftermath of the 2010 Amendments
by: CHUA, Eunice, et al.
Published: (2013)