Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils
The blockchain’s apparent immutability has attracted significant interest on whether it may be relied on for registering and transferring land. Proponents of blockchain-based land systems point toward data security, automated transacting, and improved accessibility as key benefits; critics raise con...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3912 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5870/viewcontent/SSRN_id4072348.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5870 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-58702024-08-13T05:56:11Z Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils OOI, Vincent SOH, Kian Peng SOH, Jerrold The blockchain’s apparent immutability has attracted significant interest on whether it may be relied on for registering and transferring land. Proponents of blockchain-based land systems point toward data security, automated transacting, and improved accessibility as key benefits; critics raise concerns over structural vulnerabilities, such as majority attacks, and inconsistencies with existing legal frameworks. The literature, however, tends to conceptualise blockchain as one monolithic data structure invariably built on the same mechanisms powering Bitcoin. This paper seeks to situate the debate on a closer understanding of the range of blockchain implementations possible. To this end, we provide a detailed technological survey of established and emerging blockchain technologies, clarifying that different consensus mechanisms, permissioning schemes, and other use-based customisations, are possible. We then re-evaluate the promises and perils of blockchain land transfers in this light, focusing on the English conveyancing system, and illustrate how different implementations involve different advantages and limitations. However, the features necessary to avoid key vulnerabilities also diminish the marginal advantages of using blockchains over traditional electronic databases. Thus, we conclude that blockchains, even properly understood, remain unsuitable for land transfers. 2022-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3912 info:doi/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105672 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5870/viewcontent/SSRN_id4072348.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Blockchain Land Registration e-Conveyancing Internet Law Property Law and Real Estate Science and Technology Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Blockchain Land Registration e-Conveyancing Internet Law Property Law and Real Estate Science and Technology Law |
spellingShingle |
Blockchain Land Registration e-Conveyancing Internet Law Property Law and Real Estate Science and Technology Law OOI, Vincent SOH, Kian Peng SOH, Jerrold Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils |
description |
The blockchain’s apparent immutability has attracted significant interest on whether it may be relied on for registering and transferring land. Proponents of blockchain-based land systems point toward data security, automated transacting, and improved accessibility as key benefits; critics raise concerns over structural vulnerabilities, such as majority attacks, and inconsistencies with existing legal frameworks. The literature, however, tends to conceptualise blockchain as one monolithic data structure invariably built on the same mechanisms powering Bitcoin. This paper seeks to situate the debate on a closer understanding of the range of blockchain implementations possible. To this end, we provide a detailed technological survey of established and emerging blockchain technologies, clarifying that different consensus mechanisms, permissioning schemes, and other use-based customisations, are possible. We then re-evaluate the promises and perils of blockchain land transfers in this light, focusing on the English conveyancing system, and illustrate how different implementations involve different advantages and limitations. However, the features necessary to avoid key vulnerabilities also diminish the marginal advantages of using blockchains over traditional electronic databases. Thus, we conclude that blockchains, even properly understood, remain unsuitable for land transfers. |
format |
text |
author |
OOI, Vincent SOH, Kian Peng SOH, Jerrold |
author_facet |
OOI, Vincent SOH, Kian Peng SOH, Jerrold |
author_sort |
OOI, Vincent |
title |
Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils |
title_short |
Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils |
title_full |
Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils |
title_fullStr |
Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils |
title_full_unstemmed |
Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils |
title_sort |
blockchain land transfers: technology, promises, and perils |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3912 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5870/viewcontent/SSRN_id4072348.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047796020379648 |