Independence and impartiality of arbitrators: A Rule of Law analysis
Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) through arbitration remains in a state of legitimacy crisis and discussions on reform are ongoing. Much of the criticism is focussed on who is deciding investment dispute cases. Investment arbitrators have been called “private judges” who operate in secrecy,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | SCHACHERER, Stefanie |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3949 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5907/viewcontent/Schacherer_2018_Independence_Impartiality_Arbitrators.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
TPP, CETA and TTIP between innovation and consolidation-resolving investor-state disputes under mega-regionals
by: SCHACHERER, Stefanie
Published: (2016) -
To boycott proceedings or not? Recourse against arbitral awards on jurisdictional grounds by different categories of respondents under the Model Law
by: CHAN, Darius, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Corruption in Arbitration -- Law and Reality
by: Hwang, Michael SC, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Remedies in International Law (Uniformity in International Commercial Arbitration)
by: FURMSTON, Michael Philip
Published: (1998) -
Book review: The UNCITRAL model law and Asian arbitration laws: Implementation and comparison
by: CHAN, Darius
Published: (2020)