Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil

Even though unjust enrichment has been recognised by English law for several decades, this branch of the law continues to be a highly contested area. Debate rages on with respect to many facets including the formal structure of the subject, the ambit of unjust factors and its relationship with the l...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	TANG, Hang Wu
Format:	text
Language:	English
Published:	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:	Singapore law of unjust enrichment restitution Asian Studies Property Law and Real Estate
Online Access:	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3970
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	Singapore Management University
Language:	English

id	sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5928
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-smu-ink.sol_research-59282023-07-21T01:23:41Z Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil TANG, Hang Wu Even though unjust enrichment has been recognised by English law for several decades, this branch of the law continues to be a highly contested area. Debate rages on with respect to many facets including the formal structure of the subject, the ambit of unjust factors and its relationship with the law of property. The decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Esben Finance Ltd and Others v Wong Hou-Lianq Neil (‘Esben Finance Ltd’) explores many of these difficult areas. In a wide-ranging judgment, Esben Finance Ltd covers an astonishing variety of issues namely limitation period, at claimant’s expense, illegality, unjust factors and the relationship between unjust enrichment and property law 2022-08-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3970 info:doi/10.1080/09615768.2022.2104679 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore law of unjust enrichment restitution Asian Studies Property Law and Real Estate
institution	Singapore Management University
building	SMU Libraries
continent	Asia
country	Singapore Singapore
content_provider	SMU Libraries
collection	InK@SMU
language	English
topic	Singapore law of unjust enrichment restitution Asian Studies Property Law and Real Estate
spellingShingle	Singapore law of unjust enrichment restitution Asian Studies Property Law and Real Estate TANG, Hang Wu Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil
description	Even though unjust enrichment has been recognised by English law for several decades, this branch of the law continues to be a highly contested area. Debate rages on with respect to many facets including the formal structure of the subject, the ambit of unjust factors and its relationship with the law of property. The decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Esben Finance Ltd and Others v Wong Hou-Lianq Neil (‘Esben Finance Ltd’) explores many of these difficult areas. In a wide-ranging judgment, Esben Finance Ltd covers an astonishing variety of issues namely limitation period, at claimant’s expense, illegality, unjust factors and the relationship between unjust enrichment and property law
format	text
author	TANG, Hang Wu
author_facet	TANG, Hang Wu
author_sort	TANG, Hang Wu
title	Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil
title_short	Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil
title_full	Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil
title_fullStr	Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil
title_full_unstemmed	Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil
title_sort	limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: esben finance ltd and others v wong hou-lianq neil
publisher	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate	2022
url	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3970
_version_	1772829259226677248

Limitation period for unjust enrichment claims, at the claimant’s expense, lack of consent, illegality, and vindication of property rights: Esben Finance Ltd and Others V Wong Hou-Lianq Neil

Similar Items