Company Law

In Sim Poh Ping v Winsta Holding Pte Ltd, 2 a director submitted that he was not in breach of the no-conflict rule as he had not favoured his own interests over those of the plaintiff group since he had no interests in the defendant corporations to whom the opportunities had been diverted. This is a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KOH Alan, PUCHNIAK Dan W., PUCHNIAK, Dan W.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4020
https://search.library.smu.edu.sg/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_316848008682009&context=PC&vid=65SMU_INST:SMU_NUI&lang=en&search_scope=Everything&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Singapore%20Academy%20of%20Law%20annual%20review%20of%20Singapore%20cases%202020%20company%20law&offset=0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5978
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-59782022-12-22T03:18:57Z Company Law KOH Alan, PUCHNIAK Dan W., PUCHNIAK, Dan W. In Sim Poh Ping v Winsta Holding Pte Ltd, 2 a director submitted that he was not in breach of the no-conflict rule as he had not favoured his own interests over those of the plaintiff group since he had no interests in the defendant corporations to whom the opportunities had been diverted. This is an extremely narrow conception of the no-conflict rule and was rightly rejected by the Court of Appeal, which pointed out that a breach of this duty can take place if the interests of a third party are preferred over those of the party to whom the duty is owed. 2021-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4020 https://search.library.smu.edu.sg/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_316848008682009&context=PC&vid=65SMU_INST:SMU_NUI&lang=en&search_scope=Everything&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Singapore%20Academy%20of%20Law%20annual%20review%20of%20Singapore%20cases%202020%20company%20law&offset=0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Business Organizations Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Asian Studies
Business Organizations Law
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Business Organizations Law
KOH Alan,
PUCHNIAK Dan W.,
PUCHNIAK, Dan W.
Company Law
description In Sim Poh Ping v Winsta Holding Pte Ltd, 2 a director submitted that he was not in breach of the no-conflict rule as he had not favoured his own interests over those of the plaintiff group since he had no interests in the defendant corporations to whom the opportunities had been diverted. This is an extremely narrow conception of the no-conflict rule and was rightly rejected by the Court of Appeal, which pointed out that a breach of this duty can take place if the interests of a third party are preferred over those of the party to whom the duty is owed.
format text
author KOH Alan,
PUCHNIAK Dan W.,
PUCHNIAK, Dan W.
author_facet KOH Alan,
PUCHNIAK Dan W.,
PUCHNIAK, Dan W.
author_sort KOH Alan,
title Company Law
title_short Company Law
title_full Company Law
title_fullStr Company Law
title_full_unstemmed Company Law
title_sort company law
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4020
https://search.library.smu.edu.sg/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_316848008682009&context=PC&vid=65SMU_INST:SMU_NUI&lang=en&search_scope=Everything&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Singapore%20Academy%20of%20Law%20annual%20review%20of%20Singapore%20cases%202020%20company%20law&offset=0
_version_ 1794549688881381376