The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action

Written constitutions often include generalized guarantees of equal protection which imply a proscription on unconstitutional differential treatment. This paper will examine what the analytical focus ought to be when evaluating challenges to executive action based on such rights, a particularly rele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4037
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5995/viewcontent/The_relevance_of_purpose_in_constitutional_equal_protection_challenges_to_executive_action.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-5995
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-59952023-01-20T03:22:58Z The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny Written constitutions often include generalized guarantees of equal protection which imply a proscription on unconstitutional differential treatment. This paper will examine what the analytical focus ought to be when evaluating challenges to executive action based on such rights, a particularly relevant issue given recent developments in Hong Kong’s and Singapore’s equal protection jurisprudence. These developments suggest that there are three possible analytical focal points, each of which takes a different perspective on the relevance of the executive’s purpose in utilizing differential treatment: (1) the connection between the chosen differentiation and the specific purpose of the challenged executive action; (2) the connection between the differentiation and the broad purpose for which power was conferred upon the authority to perform the challenged action; and (3) a generalized assessment of the action’s rationality independent of purpose. This paper will critically evaluate each of these possibilities. It will argue that a specific purpose approach (namely (1)) is to be preferred, and that such an approach should be substantiated through a structured proportionality framework. © 2022 School of Law, City University of Hong Kong. 2022-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4037 info:doi/10.1080/10192557.2022.2073708 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5995/viewcontent/The_relevance_of_purpose_in_constitutional_equal_protection_challenges_to_executive_action.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Equal protection Executive action Hong Kong Judicial review Singapore Comparative and Foreign Law Public Law and Legal Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Equal protection
Executive action
Hong Kong
Judicial review
Singapore
Comparative and Foreign Law
Public Law and Legal Theory
spellingShingle Equal protection
Executive action
Hong Kong
Judicial review
Singapore
Comparative and Foreign Law
Public Law and Legal Theory
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
description Written constitutions often include generalized guarantees of equal protection which imply a proscription on unconstitutional differential treatment. This paper will examine what the analytical focus ought to be when evaluating challenges to executive action based on such rights, a particularly relevant issue given recent developments in Hong Kong’s and Singapore’s equal protection jurisprudence. These developments suggest that there are three possible analytical focal points, each of which takes a different perspective on the relevance of the executive’s purpose in utilizing differential treatment: (1) the connection between the chosen differentiation and the specific purpose of the challenged executive action; (2) the connection between the differentiation and the broad purpose for which power was conferred upon the authority to perform the challenged action; and (3) a generalized assessment of the action’s rationality independent of purpose. This paper will critically evaluate each of these possibilities. It will argue that a specific purpose approach (namely (1)) is to be preferred, and that such an approach should be substantiated through a structured proportionality framework. © 2022 School of Law, City University of Hong Kong.
format text
author CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
author_facet CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
author_sort CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
title The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
title_short The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
title_full The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
title_fullStr The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
title_full_unstemmed The relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
title_sort relevance of purpose in constitutional equal protection challenges to executive action
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4037
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/5995/viewcontent/The_relevance_of_purpose_in_constitutional_equal_protection_challenges_to_executive_action.pdf
_version_ 1770576452643717120