Legal dispositionism and artificially-intelligent attributions
It is conventionally argued that because an artificially-intelligent (AI) system acts autonomously, its makers cannot easily be held liable should the system's actions harm. Since the system cannot be liable on its own account either, existing laws expose victims to accountability gaps and need...
Saved in:
Main Author: | SOH, Jerrold |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4136 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6094/viewcontent/legal_dispositionism_and_artificially_intelligent_attributions.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Regulatory insights on artificial intelligence
by: FINDLAY, Mark, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Regulating religious robots: free exercise and RFRA in the time of superintelligent artificial intelligence
by: Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
Published: (2017) -
Regulating artificial Intelligence in international investment law
by: MCLAUGHLIN, Mark
Published: (2023) -
LexGLUE: A benchmark dataset for legal language understanding in English
by: CHALKIDIS, Ilias, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Artificial intelligence and global trade governance: A pluralist agenda
by: LIU, Han-wei, et al.
Published: (2020)