Jurisprudential oaks from mythical acorns: The Hart‐Dworkin debate revisited
This article attempts to demonstrate, via the famous Hart-Dworkin debate on the nature and functions of judicial discretion, that substantial jurisprudential disputes as well as theories can, and do, arise from misconceived critiques, whether intended or otherwise. It also seeks to show that, whilst...
Saved in:
Main Author: | PHANG, Andrew B.L. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1990
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4173 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6131/viewcontent/3RatioJuris385.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Beyond Pepper v. Hart: The legislative reform of statutory interpretation in Singapore
by: BECKMAN, Robert C., et al.
Published: (1994) -
The case against physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia: A jurisprudential consideration
by: TAN, Seow Hon
Published: (2017) -
Restitutionary and Exemplary Damages Revisited
by: PHANG, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Drawing Lines in the Sand? Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionability Revisited
by: PHANG, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Beyond Pepper v. Hart: The legislative reform of statutory interpretation in Singapore
by: PHANG, Andrew B.L., et al.
Published: (1994)