Positivism in the English law of contract
While there has been no paucity of theoretical discussion on the law of contract,’ there has, in English law at least, been little clear evidence from the courts themselves which particular jurisprudential approach is favoured.2 This is not surprising, given the rather formal nature of the English l...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1992
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4174 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6132/viewcontent/Modern_Law_Review___January_1992___Phang___Positivism_in_the_English_Law_of_Contract.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | While there has been no paucity of theoretical discussion on the law of contract,’ there has, in English law at least, been little clear evidence from the courts themselves which particular jurisprudential approach is favoured.2 This is not surprising, given the rather formal nature of the English legal system.’ Herein, perhaps, lies a clue - that English law in general and its contract law in particular are generally oriented towards so-called ‘black letter law’; or, to be more precise, that the generally favoured conception of law is that of po~itivism.~ Asalready mentioned, however, there has been little express acknowledgement of this approach by the courts. This is why two important cases decided by the Court of Appeal5 merit consideration. Each of these decisions has had (for the time being at least)6 a profound influence upon its own particular area of the English common law of contract. The first, Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp Bhd,’ concerned the legal effect of a specific clause in a letter of comfort; the second, Bunk oflvova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Good Luck,a was a lengthy judgment that not only traversed many complex points relating to the law of insurance as well as the relationship between tort and contract, but also contained very significant pronouncements upon the contractual implication of terms, the latter of which constitutes the focus of the instant comment. |
---|