New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication

The article analyses investment rulemaking in new Asian regionalism in the context of evolving national legislation and regional trade strategies. It argues that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) represent Asia's pragma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HSIEH, Pasha L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4209
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6167/viewcontent/new_investment_rulemaking_in_asia_between_regionalism_and_domestication_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6167
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-61672023-05-22T03:37:41Z New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication HSIEH, Pasha L. The article analyses investment rulemaking in new Asian regionalism in the context of evolving national legislation and regional trade strategies. It argues that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) represent Asia's pragmatic incrementalism in reforming the investment regime. The process reinforces the relationship between international economic law and domestic investment laws. In tandem with transforming international investment agreements, ASEAN expedited investment and services trade, and established the modern investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The RCEP further buttresses the ASEAN centrality in regional frameworks by consolidating ASEAN Plus One agreements. Yet, the RCEP's omission of ISDS reflects a distinct approach that may confront challenges to state-to-state proceedings and treaty shopping under overlapping pacts. Finally, the research sheds light on Asian countries' recent investment agreements and domestic dispute settlement that complement the liberal international order. These developments provide valuable models for developing countries and contribute to the understanding of global investment reforms from an Asian perspective. 2023-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4209 info:doi/10.1017/S1474745622000362 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6167/viewcontent/new_investment_rulemaking_in_asia_between_regionalism_and_domestication_pvoa_cc_by.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University ASEAN CPTPP investment law ISDS RCEP Asian Studies International Law International Trade Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic ASEAN
CPTPP
investment law
ISDS
RCEP
Asian Studies
International Law
International Trade Law
spellingShingle ASEAN
CPTPP
investment law
ISDS
RCEP
Asian Studies
International Law
International Trade Law
HSIEH, Pasha L.
New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
description The article analyses investment rulemaking in new Asian regionalism in the context of evolving national legislation and regional trade strategies. It argues that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) represent Asia's pragmatic incrementalism in reforming the investment regime. The process reinforces the relationship between international economic law and domestic investment laws. In tandem with transforming international investment agreements, ASEAN expedited investment and services trade, and established the modern investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The RCEP further buttresses the ASEAN centrality in regional frameworks by consolidating ASEAN Plus One agreements. Yet, the RCEP's omission of ISDS reflects a distinct approach that may confront challenges to state-to-state proceedings and treaty shopping under overlapping pacts. Finally, the research sheds light on Asian countries' recent investment agreements and domestic dispute settlement that complement the liberal international order. These developments provide valuable models for developing countries and contribute to the understanding of global investment reforms from an Asian perspective.
format text
author HSIEH, Pasha L.
author_facet HSIEH, Pasha L.
author_sort HSIEH, Pasha L.
title New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
title_short New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
title_full New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
title_fullStr New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
title_full_unstemmed New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
title_sort new investment rulemaking in asia: between regionalism and domestication
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4209
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6167/viewcontent/new_investment_rulemaking_in_asia_between_regionalism_and_domestication_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
_version_ 1770576547325935616