New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication
The article analyses investment rulemaking in new Asian regionalism in the context of evolving national legislation and regional trade strategies. It argues that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) represent Asia's pragma...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4209 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6167/viewcontent/new_investment_rulemaking_in_asia_between_regionalism_and_domestication_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6167 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-61672023-05-22T03:37:41Z New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication HSIEH, Pasha L. The article analyses investment rulemaking in new Asian regionalism in the context of evolving national legislation and regional trade strategies. It argues that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) represent Asia's pragmatic incrementalism in reforming the investment regime. The process reinforces the relationship between international economic law and domestic investment laws. In tandem with transforming international investment agreements, ASEAN expedited investment and services trade, and established the modern investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The RCEP further buttresses the ASEAN centrality in regional frameworks by consolidating ASEAN Plus One agreements. Yet, the RCEP's omission of ISDS reflects a distinct approach that may confront challenges to state-to-state proceedings and treaty shopping under overlapping pacts. Finally, the research sheds light on Asian countries' recent investment agreements and domestic dispute settlement that complement the liberal international order. These developments provide valuable models for developing countries and contribute to the understanding of global investment reforms from an Asian perspective. 2023-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4209 info:doi/10.1017/S1474745622000362 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6167/viewcontent/new_investment_rulemaking_in_asia_between_regionalism_and_domestication_pvoa_cc_by.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University ASEAN CPTPP investment law ISDS RCEP Asian Studies International Law International Trade Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
ASEAN CPTPP investment law ISDS RCEP Asian Studies International Law International Trade Law |
spellingShingle |
ASEAN CPTPP investment law ISDS RCEP Asian Studies International Law International Trade Law HSIEH, Pasha L. New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication |
description |
The article analyses investment rulemaking in new Asian regionalism in the context of evolving national legislation and regional trade strategies. It argues that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) represent Asia's pragmatic incrementalism in reforming the investment regime. The process reinforces the relationship between international economic law and domestic investment laws. In tandem with transforming international investment agreements, ASEAN expedited investment and services trade, and established the modern investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The RCEP further buttresses the ASEAN centrality in regional frameworks by consolidating ASEAN Plus One agreements. Yet, the RCEP's omission of ISDS reflects a distinct approach that may confront challenges to state-to-state proceedings and treaty shopping under overlapping pacts. Finally, the research sheds light on Asian countries' recent investment agreements and domestic dispute settlement that complement the liberal international order. These developments provide valuable models for developing countries and contribute to the understanding of global investment reforms from an Asian perspective. |
format |
text |
author |
HSIEH, Pasha L. |
author_facet |
HSIEH, Pasha L. |
author_sort |
HSIEH, Pasha L. |
title |
New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication |
title_short |
New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication |
title_full |
New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication |
title_fullStr |
New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication |
title_full_unstemmed |
New investment rulemaking in Asia: Between regionalism and domestication |
title_sort |
new investment rulemaking in asia: between regionalism and domestication |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4209 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6167/viewcontent/new_investment_rulemaking_in_asia_between_regionalism_and_domestication_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
_version_ |
1770576547325935616 |