Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
The usage of delegated legislation as a means of governance deserves significant attention, in view of the enormous impact that it is capable of having on the lives of citizens. While reforms to the process of parliamentary scrutiny are an important means of minimising the inappropriate usage of del...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4216 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6174/viewcontent/re_examining_judicial_review_of_delegated_legislation_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6174 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-61742023-06-15T06:05:12Z Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny The usage of delegated legislation as a means of governance deserves significant attention, in view of the enormous impact that it is capable of having on the lives of citizens. While reforms to the process of parliamentary scrutiny are an important means of minimising the inappropriate usage of delegated legislation, this paper explores the possibility of drawing more fruitfully upon judicial review as an additional control mechanism. It undertakes a theoretical analysis of what makes delegated legislation distinct from primary legislation and other types of executive action for the purposes of judicial review, with a view towards identifying the proper normative orientation of judicial review of delegated legislation – upholding the moral requirements of delegation relationships and safeguarding democratic accountability and the rule of law. It then argues that existing grounds of review applied towards delegated legislation go some way towards but are inadequately directed at this normative orientation. Drawing inspiration from Irish and US jurisprudence, the paper critically evaluates several possible means of filling this doctrinal space, and concludes that the non-delegation doctrine and a rule of law-based ground of judicial review directed at exercises of delegated law-making power can supplement the law of judicial review of delegated legislation. 2023-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4216 info:doi/10.1017/lst.2023.7 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6174/viewcontent/re_examining_judicial_review_of_delegated_legislation_pvoa_cc_by.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Administrative law judicial review delegated legislation rule of law Administrative Law Legislation Rule of Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Administrative law judicial review delegated legislation rule of law Administrative Law Legislation Rule of Law |
spellingShingle |
Administrative law judicial review delegated legislation rule of law Administrative Law Legislation Rule of Law CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
description |
The usage of delegated legislation as a means of governance deserves significant attention, in view of the enormous impact that it is capable of having on the lives of citizens. While reforms to the process of parliamentary scrutiny are an important means of minimising the inappropriate usage of delegated legislation, this paper explores the possibility of drawing more fruitfully upon judicial review as an additional control mechanism. It undertakes a theoretical analysis of what makes delegated legislation distinct from primary legislation and other types of executive action for the purposes of judicial review, with a view towards identifying the proper normative orientation of judicial review of delegated legislation – upholding the moral requirements of delegation relationships and safeguarding democratic accountability and the rule of law. It then argues that existing grounds of review applied towards delegated legislation go some way towards but are inadequately directed at this normative orientation. Drawing inspiration from Irish and US jurisprudence, the paper critically evaluates several possible means of filling this doctrinal space, and concludes that the non-delegation doctrine and a rule of law-based ground of judicial review directed at exercises of delegated law-making power can supplement the law of judicial review of delegated legislation. |
format |
text |
author |
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny |
author_facet |
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny |
author_sort |
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny |
title |
Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
title_short |
Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
title_full |
Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
title_fullStr |
Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
title_sort |
re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4216 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6174/viewcontent/re_examining_judicial_review_of_delegated_legislation_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
_version_ |
1770576558370586624 |