Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation

The usage of delegated legislation as a means of governance deserves significant attention, in view of the enormous impact that it is capable of having on the lives of citizens. While reforms to the process of parliamentary scrutiny are an important means of minimising the inappropriate usage of del...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4216
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6174/viewcontent/re_examining_judicial_review_of_delegated_legislation_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6174
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-61742023-06-15T06:05:12Z Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny The usage of delegated legislation as a means of governance deserves significant attention, in view of the enormous impact that it is capable of having on the lives of citizens. While reforms to the process of parliamentary scrutiny are an important means of minimising the inappropriate usage of delegated legislation, this paper explores the possibility of drawing more fruitfully upon judicial review as an additional control mechanism. It undertakes a theoretical analysis of what makes delegated legislation distinct from primary legislation and other types of executive action for the purposes of judicial review, with a view towards identifying the proper normative orientation of judicial review of delegated legislation – upholding the moral requirements of delegation relationships and safeguarding democratic accountability and the rule of law. It then argues that existing grounds of review applied towards delegated legislation go some way towards but are inadequately directed at this normative orientation. Drawing inspiration from Irish and US jurisprudence, the paper critically evaluates several possible means of filling this doctrinal space, and concludes that the non-delegation doctrine and a rule of law-based ground of judicial review directed at exercises of delegated law-making power can supplement the law of judicial review of delegated legislation. 2023-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4216 info:doi/10.1017/lst.2023.7 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6174/viewcontent/re_examining_judicial_review_of_delegated_legislation_pvoa_cc_by.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Administrative law judicial review delegated legislation rule of law Administrative Law Legislation Rule of Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Administrative law
judicial review
delegated legislation
rule of law
Administrative Law
Legislation
Rule of Law
spellingShingle Administrative law
judicial review
delegated legislation
rule of law
Administrative Law
Legislation
Rule of Law
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
description The usage of delegated legislation as a means of governance deserves significant attention, in view of the enormous impact that it is capable of having on the lives of citizens. While reforms to the process of parliamentary scrutiny are an important means of minimising the inappropriate usage of delegated legislation, this paper explores the possibility of drawing more fruitfully upon judicial review as an additional control mechanism. It undertakes a theoretical analysis of what makes delegated legislation distinct from primary legislation and other types of executive action for the purposes of judicial review, with a view towards identifying the proper normative orientation of judicial review of delegated legislation – upholding the moral requirements of delegation relationships and safeguarding democratic accountability and the rule of law. It then argues that existing grounds of review applied towards delegated legislation go some way towards but are inadequately directed at this normative orientation. Drawing inspiration from Irish and US jurisprudence, the paper critically evaluates several possible means of filling this doctrinal space, and concludes that the non-delegation doctrine and a rule of law-based ground of judicial review directed at exercises of delegated law-making power can supplement the law of judicial review of delegated legislation.
format text
author CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
author_facet CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
author_sort CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny
title Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
title_short Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
title_full Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
title_fullStr Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
title_full_unstemmed Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
title_sort re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4216
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6174/viewcontent/re_examining_judicial_review_of_delegated_legislation_pvoa_cc_by.pdf
_version_ 1770576558370586624