Reactions to Williams v Roffey
English court of Appeal decision in 'Williams' important case in the consideration in contract law - existing duty rule - reactions to 'Williams' in the United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore - role of pragmatism in the analysis of consideration - relevance of reliance as a basi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1995
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4252 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6210 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-62102023-06-15T03:36:02Z Reactions to Williams v Roffey PHANG, Andrew B.L. CARTER, J. W. POOLE, Jill English court of Appeal decision in 'Williams' important case in the consideration in contract law - existing duty rule - reactions to 'Williams' in the United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore - role of pragmatism in the analysis of consideration - relevance of reliance as a basis for liability - distinctions between forms of existing duty and the role of precedent. 1995-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4252 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Contracts |
| institution |
Singapore Management University |
| building |
SMU Libraries |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Singapore Singapore |
| content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
| collection |
InK@SMU |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Contracts |
| spellingShingle |
Contracts PHANG, Andrew B.L. CARTER, J. W. POOLE, Jill Reactions to Williams v Roffey |
| description |
English court of Appeal decision in 'Williams' important case in the consideration in contract law - existing duty rule - reactions to 'Williams' in the United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore - role of pragmatism in the analysis of consideration - relevance of reliance as a basis for liability - distinctions between forms of existing duty and the role of precedent. |
| format |
text |
| author |
PHANG, Andrew B.L. CARTER, J. W. POOLE, Jill |
| author_facet |
PHANG, Andrew B.L. CARTER, J. W. POOLE, Jill |
| author_sort |
PHANG, Andrew B.L. |
| title |
Reactions to Williams v Roffey |
| title_short |
Reactions to Williams v Roffey |
| title_full |
Reactions to Williams v Roffey |
| title_fullStr |
Reactions to Williams v Roffey |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reactions to Williams v Roffey |
| title_sort |
reactions to williams v roffey |
| publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
| publishDate |
1995 |
| url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4252 |
| _version_ |
1770576565253439488 |