Common law, equity, and statute: The effect of juridical sources on Choice-of-Law methodology

Methodological issues in choice of law can arise in Anglo-Commonwealth common law systems because of the structure of legal rules in such systems. Statutes override judge-made law, even if judges are the ultimate authority on the question of interpretation. Within judge-made law, equitable principle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: YEO, Tiong Min
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4287
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Methodological issues in choice of law can arise in Anglo-Commonwealth common law systems because of the structure of legal rules in such systems. Statutes override judge-made law, even if judges are the ultimate authority on the question of interpretation. Within judge-made law, equitable principles override the common law in the event of conflict. Most of the choice of law rules have been developed in the courts within the common law (as opposed to the equitable) jurisdiction. It has sometimes been argued that different choice of law approaches should apply when the equitable principles or statutory law of the forum are invoked. The main contours of the controversies and the practical implications of the different approaches that have developed in common law systems are examined.