Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37
Decisions from the lowest tier of the judicial hierarchy are normally ignored because they do not have precedential value. However, the case of Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 should be studied closely as this is the first time that the concept of automatism (ie, involuntariness) in...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4345 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6303 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-63032024-01-04T08:28:45Z Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 CHAN, Wing Cheong Decisions from the lowest tier of the judicial hierarchy are normally ignored because they do not have precedential value. However, the case of Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 should be studied closely as this is the first time that the concept of automatism (ie, involuntariness) in general, and non-insane automatism in particular, have been analysed by the Singapore Judiciary in a criminal case. This comment argues that there is a need for intervention by the Legislature to clarify if non-insane automatism is in fact recognised in Singapore’s criminal law and if so, what its precise parameters are. 2023-09-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4345 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Asian Studies Criminal Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Asian Studies Criminal Law |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Criminal Law CHAN, Wing Cheong Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 |
description |
Decisions from the lowest tier of the judicial hierarchy are normally ignored because they do not have precedential value. However, the case of Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 should be studied closely as this is the first time that the concept of automatism (ie, involuntariness) in general, and non-insane automatism in particular, have been analysed by the Singapore Judiciary in a criminal case. This comment argues that there is a need for intervention by the Legislature to clarify if non-insane automatism is in fact recognised in Singapore’s criminal law and if so, what its precise parameters are. |
format |
text |
author |
CHAN, Wing Cheong |
author_facet |
CHAN, Wing Cheong |
author_sort |
CHAN, Wing Cheong |
title |
Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 |
title_short |
Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 |
title_full |
Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 |
title_fullStr |
Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-Insane automatism and the Singapore Penal Code: Public Prosecutor v Ong Jun Yong [2022] SGMC 37 |
title_sort |
non-insane automatism and the singapore penal code: public prosecutor v ong jun yong [2022] sgmc 37 |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4345 |
_version_ |
1787590763676172288 |