Property in digital coins

Digital coins have burst into mainstream awareness recently, mainly as a result of high-worth ‘Initial Coin Offerings’ (‘ICOs’). The most immediate question in the legal treatment of digital coins is whether they are properly seen as digital ‘commodities’, and/or as ‘securities’, and/or as units of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ALLEN, J.G.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4444
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6402/viewcontent/PROPERTY_IN_DIGITAL_COIN.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6402
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-64022024-05-27T02:39:56Z Property in digital coins ALLEN, J.G. Digital coins have burst into mainstream awareness recently, mainly as a result of high-worth ‘Initial Coin Offerings’ (‘ICOs’). The most immediate question in the legal treatment of digital coins is whether they are properly seen as digital ‘commodities’, and/or as ‘securities’, and/or as units of ‘money’. But the conceptual underpinnings of these categories are not clear, nor is it clear how these categories relate to each other; no legal system currently deals adequately with incorporeal objects as objects of property law. This category includes not only digital coins but also some forms of conventional money and securities. Establishing a satisfactory account of their treatment in property law is therefore a necessary first step to incorporating digital coins into private law theory. I argue that this task is best approached on the basis of a plausible ontology of incorporeal objects, including those embodied in paper (i.e. banknotes and conventional securities) and those that exist natively in ‘cyberspace’ (i.e. electronic ‘book-money’, modern securities, and now digital coins). We therefore urgently need to develop a plausible account of a how packets of data can be treated as an object of property rights. Using a comparative analysis of English law and Civilian law (particularly German) concepts of property as an entry point into this complex of problems, I explore the ontology of incorporeal objects and the role of documentation in their creation and maintenance as part of the ‘ontic furniture’ of our economic world. I explore the conceptual basis of property in digital coins in terms of a new category of property. Such a category is long overdue and will be increasingly important in the future. 2019-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4444 info:doi/10.1515/eplj-2019-0005 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6402/viewcontent/PROPERTY_IN_DIGITAL_COIN.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Digital coins Mainstream awareness Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) Property law Property Law and Real Estate Science and Technology Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Digital coins
Mainstream awareness
Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
Property law
Property Law and Real Estate
Science and Technology Law
spellingShingle Digital coins
Mainstream awareness
Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
Property law
Property Law and Real Estate
Science and Technology Law
ALLEN, J.G.
Property in digital coins
description Digital coins have burst into mainstream awareness recently, mainly as a result of high-worth ‘Initial Coin Offerings’ (‘ICOs’). The most immediate question in the legal treatment of digital coins is whether they are properly seen as digital ‘commodities’, and/or as ‘securities’, and/or as units of ‘money’. But the conceptual underpinnings of these categories are not clear, nor is it clear how these categories relate to each other; no legal system currently deals adequately with incorporeal objects as objects of property law. This category includes not only digital coins but also some forms of conventional money and securities. Establishing a satisfactory account of their treatment in property law is therefore a necessary first step to incorporating digital coins into private law theory. I argue that this task is best approached on the basis of a plausible ontology of incorporeal objects, including those embodied in paper (i.e. banknotes and conventional securities) and those that exist natively in ‘cyberspace’ (i.e. electronic ‘book-money’, modern securities, and now digital coins). We therefore urgently need to develop a plausible account of a how packets of data can be treated as an object of property rights. Using a comparative analysis of English law and Civilian law (particularly German) concepts of property as an entry point into this complex of problems, I explore the ontology of incorporeal objects and the role of documentation in their creation and maintenance as part of the ‘ontic furniture’ of our economic world. I explore the conceptual basis of property in digital coins in terms of a new category of property. Such a category is long overdue and will be increasingly important in the future.
format text
author ALLEN, J.G.
author_facet ALLEN, J.G.
author_sort ALLEN, J.G.
title Property in digital coins
title_short Property in digital coins
title_full Property in digital coins
title_fullStr Property in digital coins
title_full_unstemmed Property in digital coins
title_sort property in digital coins
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4444
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6402/viewcontent/PROPERTY_IN_DIGITAL_COIN.pdf
_version_ 1814047539654033408