How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses
This paper endeavours to conceptualize and provide an analytical framework for China’s response to U.S. trade policy. It analyses the following questions: what is the new U.S. trade approach? How might China respond to the United States’ trade approach? What are the trend and implications of China’s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4467 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6425/viewcontent/HowMayChinaRespond_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6425 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-64252024-07-17T07:08:05Z How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses WANG, Heng This paper endeavours to conceptualize and provide an analytical framework for China’s response to U.S. trade policy. It analyses the following questions: what is the new U.S. trade approach? How might China respond to the United States’ trade approach? What are the trend and implications of China’s response to the U.S. trade approach? It argues, first, that the U.S. trade approach has not changed regarding most of the U.S.-style regulatory disciplines. However, it has changed in terms of the shift toward managed trade, unilateralism and trade enforcement. Second, China will likely adopt a three-track approach: consisting of retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses. Third, these responses exist on a political-legal spectrum that spans from a more political retaliatory response through to an inclusive one, or a more legalized approach (regulatory response). The inclusive response is likely to be given primacy by China over the other two responses, and China’s responses carry profound implications. 2018-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4467 info:doi/10.7916/cjal.v31i2.3367 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6425/viewcontent/HowMayChinaRespond_pvoa_cc_by.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Trade policy United States China trade approach regulatory response Asian Studies International Trade Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Trade policy United States China trade approach regulatory response Asian Studies International Trade Law |
spellingShingle |
Trade policy United States China trade approach regulatory response Asian Studies International Trade Law WANG, Heng How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
description |
This paper endeavours to conceptualize and provide an analytical framework for China’s response to U.S. trade policy. It analyses the following questions: what is the new U.S. trade approach? How might China respond to the United States’ trade approach? What are the trend and implications of China’s response to the U.S. trade approach? It argues, first, that the U.S. trade approach has not changed regarding most of the U.S.-style regulatory disciplines. However, it has changed in terms of the shift toward managed trade, unilateralism and trade enforcement. Second, China will likely adopt a three-track approach: consisting of retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses. Third, these responses exist on a political-legal spectrum that spans from a more political retaliatory response through to an inclusive one, or a more legalized approach (regulatory response). The inclusive response is likely to be given primacy by China over the other two responses, and China’s responses carry profound implications. |
format |
text |
author |
WANG, Heng |
author_facet |
WANG, Heng |
author_sort |
WANG, Heng |
title |
How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
title_short |
How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
title_full |
How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
title_fullStr |
How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
title_full_unstemmed |
How may China respond to the U.S. trade approach? Retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
title_sort |
how may china respond to the u.s. trade approach? retaliatory, inclusive and regulatory responses |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4467 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6425/viewcontent/HowMayChinaRespond_pvoa_cc_by.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047665044848640 |