The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs

The chapter analyses China’s FTA approach to investment in terms of malleability, and its implications for the RCEP. The following questions are discussed: what is the trend of China’s FTA approach to investment concerning malleability? Is China a rule follower, shaker, or maker? How may China’s app...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: WANG, Heng
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4494
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6452
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sol_research-64522024-07-25T07:32:03Z The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs WANG, Heng The chapter analyses China’s FTA approach to investment in terms of malleability, and its implications for the RCEP. The following questions are discussed: what is the trend of China’s FTA approach to investment concerning malleability? Is China a rule follower, shaker, or maker? How may China’s approach the RCEP regarding investment? The chapter demonstrates, firstly, that China is willing to substantially improve rules and embrace newer style investment stipulations. The ChAFTA contains innovative safeguards of regulatory autonomy and ISDS procedural features (including the roster of arbitration panellists, the public welfare notice, the code of conduct for arbitrators, and the joint interpretation of the annex by treaty parties). Secondly, China will probably be a rule shaker in the short to medium term, and possibly becomes a rule-maker in the long term. Its approach may evolve from selective adaption to targeted innovation. The reason is plain as China will be increasingly active in the development of investment norms due to the need to protect its outbound investment and enhance investor confidence in inbound investment. As a rule-shaker in the RCEP negotiations, China will often modify proposals of partners rather than offer a new set of clauses. Given various factors (including the unique nature of mega FTA, ‘stockpile’ of existing investment agreements, and China’s approach to the ASEAN), China may take a more flexible stance in the RCEP than in bilateral FTAs. The RCEP will affect the shaping of China’s FTA approach to investment. 2019-02-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4494 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University China RCEP China–Korea FTA ISDS foreign direct investment investor–state dispute settlement Asian Studies International Trade Law
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic China
RCEP
China–Korea FTA
ISDS
foreign direct investment
investor–state dispute settlement
Asian Studies
International Trade Law
spellingShingle China
RCEP
China–Korea FTA
ISDS
foreign direct investment
investor–state dispute settlement
Asian Studies
International Trade Law
WANG, Heng
The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
description The chapter analyses China’s FTA approach to investment in terms of malleability, and its implications for the RCEP. The following questions are discussed: what is the trend of China’s FTA approach to investment concerning malleability? Is China a rule follower, shaker, or maker? How may China’s approach the RCEP regarding investment? The chapter demonstrates, firstly, that China is willing to substantially improve rules and embrace newer style investment stipulations. The ChAFTA contains innovative safeguards of regulatory autonomy and ISDS procedural features (including the roster of arbitration panellists, the public welfare notice, the code of conduct for arbitrators, and the joint interpretation of the annex by treaty parties). Secondly, China will probably be a rule shaker in the short to medium term, and possibly becomes a rule-maker in the long term. Its approach may evolve from selective adaption to targeted innovation. The reason is plain as China will be increasingly active in the development of investment norms due to the need to protect its outbound investment and enhance investor confidence in inbound investment. As a rule-shaker in the RCEP negotiations, China will often modify proposals of partners rather than offer a new set of clauses. Given various factors (including the unique nature of mega FTA, ‘stockpile’ of existing investment agreements, and China’s approach to the ASEAN), China may take a more flexible stance in the RCEP than in bilateral FTAs. The RCEP will affect the shaping of China’s FTA approach to investment.
format text
author WANG, Heng
author_facet WANG, Heng
author_sort WANG, Heng
title The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
title_short The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
title_full The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
title_fullStr The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
title_full_unstemmed The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
title_sort rcep and its investment rules: learning from the malleability of chinese ftas
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4494
_version_ 1814047707183972352