The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs
The chapter analyses China’s FTA approach to investment in terms of malleability, and its implications for the RCEP. The following questions are discussed: what is the trend of China’s FTA approach to investment concerning malleability? Is China a rule follower, shaker, or maker? How may China’s app...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4494 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6452 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-64522024-07-25T07:32:03Z The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs WANG, Heng The chapter analyses China’s FTA approach to investment in terms of malleability, and its implications for the RCEP. The following questions are discussed: what is the trend of China’s FTA approach to investment concerning malleability? Is China a rule follower, shaker, or maker? How may China’s approach the RCEP regarding investment? The chapter demonstrates, firstly, that China is willing to substantially improve rules and embrace newer style investment stipulations. The ChAFTA contains innovative safeguards of regulatory autonomy and ISDS procedural features (including the roster of arbitration panellists, the public welfare notice, the code of conduct for arbitrators, and the joint interpretation of the annex by treaty parties). Secondly, China will probably be a rule shaker in the short to medium term, and possibly becomes a rule-maker in the long term. Its approach may evolve from selective adaption to targeted innovation. The reason is plain as China will be increasingly active in the development of investment norms due to the need to protect its outbound investment and enhance investor confidence in inbound investment. As a rule-shaker in the RCEP negotiations, China will often modify proposals of partners rather than offer a new set of clauses. Given various factors (including the unique nature of mega FTA, ‘stockpile’ of existing investment agreements, and China’s approach to the ASEAN), China may take a more flexible stance in the RCEP than in bilateral FTAs. The RCEP will affect the shaping of China’s FTA approach to investment. 2019-02-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4494 Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University China RCEP China–Korea FTA ISDS foreign direct investment investor–state dispute settlement Asian Studies International Trade Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
China RCEP China–Korea FTA ISDS foreign direct investment investor–state dispute settlement Asian Studies International Trade Law |
spellingShingle |
China RCEP China–Korea FTA ISDS foreign direct investment investor–state dispute settlement Asian Studies International Trade Law WANG, Heng The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs |
description |
The chapter analyses China’s FTA approach to investment in terms of malleability, and its implications for the RCEP. The following questions are discussed: what is the trend of China’s FTA approach to investment concerning malleability? Is China a rule follower, shaker, or maker? How may China’s approach the RCEP regarding investment? The chapter demonstrates, firstly, that China is willing to substantially improve rules and embrace newer style investment stipulations. The ChAFTA contains innovative safeguards of regulatory autonomy and ISDS procedural features (including the roster of arbitration panellists, the public welfare notice, the code of conduct for arbitrators, and the joint interpretation of the annex by treaty parties). Secondly, China will probably be a rule shaker in the short to medium term, and possibly becomes a rule-maker in the long term. Its approach may evolve from selective adaption to targeted innovation. The reason is plain as China will be increasingly active in the development of investment norms due to the need to protect its outbound investment and enhance investor confidence in inbound investment. As a rule-shaker in the RCEP negotiations, China will often modify proposals of partners rather than offer a new set of clauses. Given various factors (including the unique nature of mega FTA, ‘stockpile’ of existing investment agreements, and China’s approach to the ASEAN), China may take a more flexible stance in the RCEP than in bilateral FTAs. The RCEP will affect the shaping of China’s FTA approach to investment. |
format |
text |
author |
WANG, Heng |
author_facet |
WANG, Heng |
author_sort |
WANG, Heng |
title |
The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs |
title_short |
The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs |
title_full |
The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs |
title_fullStr |
The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs |
title_full_unstemmed |
The RCEP and its investment rules: Learning from the malleability of Chinese FTAs |
title_sort |
rcep and its investment rules: learning from the malleability of chinese ftas |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4494 |
_version_ |
1814047707183972352 |