"Asian" principles for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments? Singapore as a case study
This paper considers if there can be said to be an “Asian” body of principles for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Tapping on the results of a research project which was conducted from 2016 to 2020, it is submitted that the answer to this query is in the negative. However, it is...
Saved in:
Main Author: | CHONG, Adeline |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4516 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6474/viewcontent/Are_there_Asian_Principles_for_the_REFJs__KJICL___updated_AC_01102024_.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Singapore as a centre for international commercial litigation: Party autonomy to the fore
by: CHONG, Adeline, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Asia
by: CHONG, Adeline
Published: (2017) -
Report of the Law Reform Committee on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (2013) -
Foreign judgments: The limits of transnational issue estoppel, reciprocity, and transnational comity
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (2021) -
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Singapore
by: YEO, Tiong Min
Published: (2015)