Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting
Building on the computer science concept of code smells, we initiate the study of law smells, i.e., patterns in legal texts that pose threats to the comprehensibility and maintainability of the law. With five intuitive law smells as running examples—namely, duplicated phrase, long element, large ref...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4521 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6479/viewcontent/s10506_022_09315_w.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-6479 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sol_research-64792024-10-17T03:30:37Z Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting COUPETTE, Corinna HARTUNG, Dirk BECKEDORF, Janis BÖTHER, Maximilian KATZ, Daniel Martin Building on the computer science concept of code smells, we initiate the study of law smells, i.e., patterns in legal texts that pose threats to the comprehensibility and maintainability of the law. With five intuitive law smells as running examples—namely, duplicated phrase, long element, large reference tree, ambiguous syntax, and natural language obsession—, we develop a comprehensive law smell taxonomy. This taxonomy classifies law smells by when they can be detected, which aspects of law they relate to, and how they can be discovered. We introduce textbased and graph-based methods to identify instances of law smells, confirming their utility in practice using the United States Code as a test case. Our work demonstrates how ideas from software engineering can be leveraged to assess and improve the quality of legal code, thus drawing attention to an understudied area in the intersection of law and computer science and highlighting the potential of computational legal drafting. 2023-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4521 info:doi/10.1007/s10506-022-09315-w https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6479/viewcontent/s10506_022_09315_w.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Law Natural language processing Network analysis Refactoring Software engineering Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Law Science and Technology Law |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Law Natural language processing Network analysis Refactoring Software engineering Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Law Science and Technology Law |
spellingShingle |
Law Natural language processing Network analysis Refactoring Software engineering Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Law Science and Technology Law COUPETTE, Corinna HARTUNG, Dirk BECKEDORF, Janis BÖTHER, Maximilian KATZ, Daniel Martin Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
description |
Building on the computer science concept of code smells, we initiate the study of law smells, i.e., patterns in legal texts that pose threats to the comprehensibility and maintainability of the law. With five intuitive law smells as running examples—namely, duplicated phrase, long element, large reference tree, ambiguous syntax, and natural language obsession—, we develop a comprehensive law smell taxonomy. This taxonomy classifies law smells by when they can be detected, which aspects of law they relate to, and how they can be discovered. We introduce textbased and graph-based methods to identify instances of law smells, confirming their utility in practice using the United States Code as a test case. Our work demonstrates how ideas from software engineering can be leveraged to assess and improve the quality of legal code, thus drawing attention to an understudied area in the intersection of law and computer science and highlighting the potential of computational legal drafting. |
format |
text |
author |
COUPETTE, Corinna HARTUNG, Dirk BECKEDORF, Janis BÖTHER, Maximilian KATZ, Daniel Martin |
author_facet |
COUPETTE, Corinna HARTUNG, Dirk BECKEDORF, Janis BÖTHER, Maximilian KATZ, Daniel Martin |
author_sort |
COUPETTE, Corinna |
title |
Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
title_short |
Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
title_full |
Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
title_fullStr |
Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
title_full_unstemmed |
Law smells: Defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
title_sort |
law smells: defining and detecting problematic patterns in legal drafting |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4521 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sol_research/article/6479/viewcontent/s10506_022_09315_w.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047948673122304 |