Knowledge and Possession under the Misuse of Drugs Act
When the Court of Appeal rendered the decision of Tan Kiam Peng in 2008, it was unable to come to a conclusive determination of the correct interpretation of s. 18(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act, a provision pertaining to the presumption of an accused’s knowledge of the nature of the controlled drugs...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | CHEN, Siyuan, Khng, Nathaniel |
---|---|
التنسيق: | text |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2012
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/37 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=sol_research_smu |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
المؤسسة: | Singapore Management University |
اللغة: | English |
مواد مشابهة
-
Possession and Knowledge in the Misuse of Drugs Act: Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v. Public Prosecutor
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan, وآخرون
منشور في: (2012) -
The sentencing of "couriers" under section 33B of the Misuse of Drugs Act: PP v Chum Tat Suan [2014] SGCA 59
بواسطة: ONG, Benjamin Joshua
منشور في: (2014) -
The Expanding Limits of Prosecutorial Discretion: Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General [2012] SGCA 2
بواسطة: CHEN, Siyuan
منشور في: (2012) -
Beyond Punishment: Achieving International Criminal Justice
بواسطة: FINDLAY, Mark, وآخرون
منشور في: (2010) -
Jury Vetting: The Jury under Attack
بواسطة: DUFF, Peter, وآخرون
منشور في: (1983)