Recent Development on Misleading Disclosure and Non-disclosure to the Securities Market (and their relationships with Insider Trading) in Singapore: Madhavan Peter v PP and other appeals
In Madhavan Peter v PP and other appeals,[1] the Singapore court had to consider the scope of the offence of misleading disclosure to the securities market allegedly committed by three directors of Airocean,[2] a company listed on Singapore Exchange (“SGX”), and the scope of the offence of non-discl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/54 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=sol_research_smu |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | In Madhavan Peter v PP and other appeals,[1] the Singapore court had to consider the scope of the offence of misleading disclosure to the securities market allegedly committed by three directors of Airocean,[2] a company listed on Singapore Exchange (“SGX”), and the scope of the offence of non-disclosure of material information to the securities market allegedly committed by two of the three directors. The case is controversial and significant for a number of reasons. |
|---|