Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations
Richard Rorty's navigation of the pitfalls of the cosmopolitan-communitarian debate, concern with human suffering, recognition of the contingency of communal identities and relationships, and his endorsement of liberal societies, by definition inclusive and always in search of a greater justice...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/392 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1391/viewcontent/Richard_RortyMoralProgressGlobalRelations_2006_afv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-1391 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-13912017-03-27T01:52:37Z Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations JORDAAN, Eduard Richard Rorty's navigation of the pitfalls of the cosmopolitan-communitarian debate, concern with human suffering, recognition of the contingency of communal identities and relationships, and his endorsement of liberal societies, by definition inclusive and always in search of a greater justice, make it appear as though his thought can guide us towards greater concern for the world's poor. However, this article questions the progressive potential of Rorty's thought. Obstacles to such (global) moral progress include Rorty's unquestioned statism and his focus on internal outsiders who are suffering and/or oppressed, instead of external outsiders beyond national borders; his insistence on a public-private split that legitimises social indifference, coupled with a narrow understanding of responsibility; the undemandingness of his liberalism; and his emphasis on the excluding notion of ‘solidarity’, as prerequisite for moral concern. However, continuous Rortian ‘sentimental education’ can lessen the objectification of and indifference to the global poor. 2006-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/392 info:doi/10.1080/02589340600617950 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1391/viewcontent/Richard_RortyMoralProgressGlobalRelations_2006_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Rorty sentimental education liberal societies communal identities Ethics and Political Philosophy Political Science |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Rorty sentimental education liberal societies communal identities Ethics and Political Philosophy Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Rorty sentimental education liberal societies communal identities Ethics and Political Philosophy Political Science JORDAAN, Eduard Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations |
description |
Richard Rorty's navigation of the pitfalls of the cosmopolitan-communitarian debate, concern with human suffering, recognition of the contingency of communal identities and relationships, and his endorsement of liberal societies, by definition inclusive and always in search of a greater justice, make it appear as though his thought can guide us towards greater concern for the world's poor. However, this article questions the progressive potential of Rorty's thought. Obstacles to such (global) moral progress include Rorty's unquestioned statism and his focus on internal outsiders who are suffering and/or oppressed, instead of external outsiders beyond national borders; his insistence on a public-private split that legitimises social indifference, coupled with a narrow understanding of responsibility; the undemandingness of his liberalism; and his emphasis on the excluding notion of ‘solidarity’, as prerequisite for moral concern. However, continuous Rortian ‘sentimental education’ can lessen the objectification of and indifference to the global poor. |
format |
text |
author |
JORDAAN, Eduard |
author_facet |
JORDAAN, Eduard |
author_sort |
JORDAAN, Eduard |
title |
Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations |
title_short |
Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations |
title_full |
Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations |
title_fullStr |
Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Richard Rorty and Moral Progress in Global Relations |
title_sort |
richard rorty and moral progress in global relations |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/392 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1391/viewcontent/Richard_RortyMoralProgressGlobalRelations_2006_afv.pdf |
_version_ |
1770568081819566080 |