Justifying circumstances and Moore-paradoxical beliefs: A response to Brueckner
In 2004, I explained the absurdity of Moore-paradoxical belief via the syllogism (Williams 2004): (1) All circumstances that justify me in believing that p are circumstances that tend to make me believe that p. (2) All circumstances that tend to make me believe that p are circumstances that justify...
Saved in:
Main Author: | WILLIAMS, John N. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/699 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1698/viewcontent/JustifyingCircumstances_Brueckner_2009.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Moore's Paradoxes and Conscious Belief
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2006) -
Moore's Paradoxes and Iterated Belief
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2007) -
Moore’s Paradox, Defective Interpretation, Justified Belief and Conscious Belief
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2010) -
Moore's Paradox, defective interpretation, justified belief and conscious belief
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2010) -
Moore's paradox: One or two?
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (1979)