Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism
Cosmopolitanism is frequently criticised for overlooking the situatedness of morality and the importance of solidarity in their aspiration to global justice. A number of thinkers take these criticisms seriously and pursue ‘a communitarian path to cosmopolitanism’. Four such approaches are considered...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/869 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1868/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-1868 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-18682020-04-01T08:04:18Z Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism JORDAAN, Eduard Cosmopolitanism is frequently criticised for overlooking the situatedness of morality and the importance of solidarity in their aspiration to global justice. A number of thinkers take these criticisms seriously and pursue ‘a communitarian path to cosmopolitanism’. Four such approaches are considered. All four view morality and justice as grounded in a specific social setting and hold that justice is more likely to result if there is some ‘we-feeling’ among people, but are simultaneously committed to expanding the realm of justice and moral concern to beyond national boundaries. To enable the theorisation of an expanded realm of situated justice and moral concern, community is conceived as not necessarily corresponding to political boundaries and the moral the self is seen as able and eager to loosen some of its traditional moral connections and to form new ones. Unfortunately, these approaches are likely to exclude significant segments of the world’s population from the expanded realm of moral concern they theorise, most notably, a large proportion of the world’s poor. It is suggested that the thought of Emmanuel Levinas might offer a way of reducing the gap between solidarity and moral universalism. 2011-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/869 info:doi/10.1017/S0260210510001233 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1868/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Ethics and Political Philosophy Political Science |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Ethics and Political Philosophy Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Ethics and Political Philosophy Political Science JORDAAN, Eduard Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
description |
Cosmopolitanism is frequently criticised for overlooking the situatedness of morality and the importance of solidarity in their aspiration to global justice. A number of thinkers take these criticisms seriously and pursue ‘a communitarian path to cosmopolitanism’. Four such approaches are considered. All four view morality and justice as grounded in a specific social setting and hold that justice is more likely to result if there is some ‘we-feeling’ among people, but are simultaneously committed to expanding the realm of justice and moral concern to beyond national boundaries. To enable the theorisation of an expanded realm of situated justice and moral concern, community is conceived as not necessarily corresponding to political boundaries and the moral the self is seen as able and eager to loosen some of its traditional moral connections and to form new ones. Unfortunately, these approaches are likely to exclude significant segments of the world’s population from the expanded realm of moral concern they theorise, most notably, a large proportion of the world’s poor. It is suggested that the thought of Emmanuel Levinas might offer a way of reducing the gap between solidarity and moral universalism. |
format |
text |
author |
JORDAAN, Eduard |
author_facet |
JORDAAN, Eduard |
author_sort |
JORDAAN, Eduard |
title |
Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
title_short |
Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
title_full |
Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
title_fullStr |
Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
title_sort |
including the excluded: communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/869 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1868/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf |
_version_ |
1770568282427883520 |