Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences

Women rate creativity as important in a mate. But what if getting a more creative partner comes at the expense of losing a high income? Previous researchers have asked participants to their state preferences for mate characteristics one at a time. While results have been illuminating, tradeoffs rout...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LI, Norman P., Bailey, J. Michael
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/893
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-1892
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-18922018-03-28T01:25:59Z Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences LI, Norman P. Bailey, J. Michael Women rate creativity as important in a mate. But what if getting a more creative partner comes at the expense of losing a high income? Previous researchers have asked participants to their state preferences for mate characteristics one at a time. While results have been illuminating, tradeoffs routinely made among the characteristics have not been explored in depth. This research introduces two experimental methods to disentangle characteristics people consider most crucial in a mate (what people most prefer when overall choice is constrained) from those that are less crucial. In considering women for long-term mates, we found that men consider physical attractiveness a necessity, and women consider resource acquisition a necessity. Once sufficient levels of necessary characteristics are obtained, people become more interested in luxuries. Sex differences are most apparent when choices are most constrained, and less so as restrictions on overall choice are relaxed. For short-term mates, both men and women treat physical attractiveness as a necessity that takes precedence over other characteristics. From an evolutionary perspective, it may make sense that people are equipped with psychological mechanisms to choose mates as if they have the ability to make rough calculations on the marginal reproductive benefits of various mate characteristics. Similar to potential mates, researchers often face trade-offs. More naturalistic data have advantages, but experimental methods have a unique advantage in forcing people to make normally implicit trade-offs. We discuss how different methods can complement one another in studying mating preferences. 2000-06-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/893 Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Gender and Sexuality Social Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Gender and Sexuality
Social Psychology
spellingShingle Gender and Sexuality
Social Psychology
LI, Norman P.
Bailey, J. Michael
Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences
description Women rate creativity as important in a mate. But what if getting a more creative partner comes at the expense of losing a high income? Previous researchers have asked participants to their state preferences for mate characteristics one at a time. While results have been illuminating, tradeoffs routinely made among the characteristics have not been explored in depth. This research introduces two experimental methods to disentangle characteristics people consider most crucial in a mate (what people most prefer when overall choice is constrained) from those that are less crucial. In considering women for long-term mates, we found that men consider physical attractiveness a necessity, and women consider resource acquisition a necessity. Once sufficient levels of necessary characteristics are obtained, people become more interested in luxuries. Sex differences are most apparent when choices are most constrained, and less so as restrictions on overall choice are relaxed. For short-term mates, both men and women treat physical attractiveness as a necessity that takes precedence over other characteristics. From an evolutionary perspective, it may make sense that people are equipped with psychological mechanisms to choose mates as if they have the ability to make rough calculations on the marginal reproductive benefits of various mate characteristics. Similar to potential mates, researchers often face trade-offs. More naturalistic data have advantages, but experimental methods have a unique advantage in forcing people to make normally implicit trade-offs. We discuss how different methods can complement one another in studying mating preferences.
format text
author LI, Norman P.
Bailey, J. Michael
author_facet LI, Norman P.
Bailey, J. Michael
author_sort LI, Norman P.
title Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences
title_short Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences
title_full Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences
title_fullStr Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Trade-Offs and Psychological Mechanisms: Experimental Methods and Mate Preferences
title_sort trade-offs and psychological mechanisms: experimental methods and mate preferences
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2000
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/893
_version_ 1770568287147524096