Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts

The present study investigated how reports of satisfaction with specific versus global domains can be used to assess a disposition towards positivity in subjective well-being reports. College students from 41 societies (N = 7167) completed measures of life satisfaction and ratings of global and spec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DIENER, Ed, SCOLLON, Christie N., OISHI, Shigehiro, Dzokoto, Vivian, SUH, Mark Eunkook
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/930
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1929/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-1929
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-19292014-04-24T03:42:04Z Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts DIENER, Ed SCOLLON, Christie N. OISHI, Shigehiro Dzokoto, Vivian SUH, Mark Eunkook The present study investigated how reports of satisfaction with specific versus global domains can be used to assess a disposition towards positivity in subjective well-being reports. College students from 41 societies (N = 7167) completed measures of life satisfaction and ratings of global and specific aspects of their lives. For example, participants rated satisfaction with their education (global) and satisfaction with their professors, textbooks, and lectures (specific). It was hypothesized that global measures would more strongly reflect individual differences in dispositional positivity, that is, a propensity to evaluate aspects of life in general as good. At both the individual and national levels, positivity predicted life satisfaction beyond objective measures. Also, positivity was associated with norms about ideal life satisfaction such that countries and individuals who highly valued positive emotions were more likely to display positivity. The difference between more global versus more concrete measures of satisfaction can be used as an indirect and subtle measure of positivity. 2000-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/930 info:doi/10.1023/A:1010031813405 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1929/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University life satisfaction positivity happiness subjective well-being culture positive affect norms Multicultural Psychology Psychology Social Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic life satisfaction
positivity
happiness
subjective well-being
culture
positive affect
norms
Multicultural Psychology
Psychology
Social Psychology
spellingShingle life satisfaction
positivity
happiness
subjective well-being
culture
positive affect
norms
Multicultural Psychology
Psychology
Social Psychology
DIENER, Ed
SCOLLON, Christie N.
OISHI, Shigehiro
Dzokoto, Vivian
SUH, Mark Eunkook
Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
description The present study investigated how reports of satisfaction with specific versus global domains can be used to assess a disposition towards positivity in subjective well-being reports. College students from 41 societies (N = 7167) completed measures of life satisfaction and ratings of global and specific aspects of their lives. For example, participants rated satisfaction with their education (global) and satisfaction with their professors, textbooks, and lectures (specific). It was hypothesized that global measures would more strongly reflect individual differences in dispositional positivity, that is, a propensity to evaluate aspects of life in general as good. At both the individual and national levels, positivity predicted life satisfaction beyond objective measures. Also, positivity was associated with norms about ideal life satisfaction such that countries and individuals who highly valued positive emotions were more likely to display positivity. The difference between more global versus more concrete measures of satisfaction can be used as an indirect and subtle measure of positivity.
format text
author DIENER, Ed
SCOLLON, Christie N.
OISHI, Shigehiro
Dzokoto, Vivian
SUH, Mark Eunkook
author_facet DIENER, Ed
SCOLLON, Christie N.
OISHI, Shigehiro
Dzokoto, Vivian
SUH, Mark Eunkook
author_sort DIENER, Ed
title Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
title_short Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
title_full Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
title_fullStr Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
title_full_unstemmed Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
title_sort positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: global happiness is not the sum of its parts
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2000
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/930
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1929/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf
_version_ 1770568296539619328