Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts
The present study investigated how reports of satisfaction with specific versus global domains can be used to assess a disposition towards positivity in subjective well-being reports. College students from 41 societies (N = 7167) completed measures of life satisfaction and ratings of global and spec...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/930 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1929/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-1929 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-19292014-04-24T03:42:04Z Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts DIENER, Ed SCOLLON, Christie N. OISHI, Shigehiro Dzokoto, Vivian SUH, Mark Eunkook The present study investigated how reports of satisfaction with specific versus global domains can be used to assess a disposition towards positivity in subjective well-being reports. College students from 41 societies (N = 7167) completed measures of life satisfaction and ratings of global and specific aspects of their lives. For example, participants rated satisfaction with their education (global) and satisfaction with their professors, textbooks, and lectures (specific). It was hypothesized that global measures would more strongly reflect individual differences in dispositional positivity, that is, a propensity to evaluate aspects of life in general as good. At both the individual and national levels, positivity predicted life satisfaction beyond objective measures. Also, positivity was associated with norms about ideal life satisfaction such that countries and individuals who highly valued positive emotions were more likely to display positivity. The difference between more global versus more concrete measures of satisfaction can be used as an indirect and subtle measure of positivity. 2000-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/930 info:doi/10.1023/A:1010031813405 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1929/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University life satisfaction positivity happiness subjective well-being culture positive affect norms Multicultural Psychology Psychology Social Psychology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
life satisfaction positivity happiness subjective well-being culture positive affect norms Multicultural Psychology Psychology Social Psychology |
spellingShingle |
life satisfaction positivity happiness subjective well-being culture positive affect norms Multicultural Psychology Psychology Social Psychology DIENER, Ed SCOLLON, Christie N. OISHI, Shigehiro Dzokoto, Vivian SUH, Mark Eunkook Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts |
description |
The present study investigated how reports of satisfaction with specific versus global domains can be used to assess a disposition towards positivity in subjective well-being reports. College students from 41 societies (N = 7167) completed measures of life satisfaction and ratings of global and specific aspects of their lives. For example, participants rated satisfaction with their education (global) and satisfaction with their professors, textbooks, and lectures (specific). It was hypothesized that global measures would more strongly reflect individual differences in dispositional positivity, that is, a propensity to evaluate aspects of life in general as good. At both the individual and national levels, positivity predicted life satisfaction beyond objective measures. Also, positivity was associated with norms about ideal life satisfaction such that countries and individuals who highly valued positive emotions were more likely to display positivity. The difference between more global versus more concrete measures of satisfaction can be used as an indirect and subtle measure of positivity. |
format |
text |
author |
DIENER, Ed SCOLLON, Christie N. OISHI, Shigehiro Dzokoto, Vivian SUH, Mark Eunkook |
author_facet |
DIENER, Ed SCOLLON, Christie N. OISHI, Shigehiro Dzokoto, Vivian SUH, Mark Eunkook |
author_sort |
DIENER, Ed |
title |
Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts |
title_short |
Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts |
title_full |
Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts |
title_fullStr |
Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Positivity and the Construction of Life Satisfaction Judgments: Global Happiness Is Not the Sum of Its Parts |
title_sort |
positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: global happiness is not the sum of its parts |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2000 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/930 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/1929/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf |
_version_ |
1770568296539619328 |