Moore’s Paradox, Defective Interpretation, Justified Belief and Conscious Belief
In this journal, Hamid Vahid argues against three families of explanation of Moore-paradoxicality. The first is the Wittgensteinian approach; I assert that p just in case I assert that I believe that p. So making a Moore-paradoxical assertion involves contradictory assertions. The second is the epis...
Saved in:
Main Author: | WILLIAMS, John N. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/971 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Moore's Paradox, defective interpretation, justified belief and conscious belief
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2010) -
Moore-Paradoxical Assertion, Fully Conscious Belief and the Transparency of Belief
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2012) -
Moore’s Paradox and the Priority of Belief Thesis
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2013) -
Moore-paradoxical belief, conscious belief and the epistemic Ramsey test
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2012) -
Moore’s paradox in belief and desire
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2014)