Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?

In the past two decades, film festivals have spread around the globe remarkably fast. They show high isomorphism in terms of organizational form, goals, programs and resourcing types, including strategies for institutional embedding in urban cultural policy planning contexts. At the same time they r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: VOGEL, Ann
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/988
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-2244
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-22442011-07-06T10:30:09Z Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity? VOGEL, Ann In the past two decades, film festivals have spread around the globe remarkably fast. They show high isomorphism in terms of organizational form, goals, programs and resourcing types, including strategies for institutional embedding in urban cultural policy planning contexts. At the same time they remain a highly stratified organizational population of which only the top tier--Western organizations--forms the core of the global festival circuit. According to global modernity (GM) scholars, we'd expect that Asian film festivals--part of the recent organizational founding wave--are active agents in the making of such a new modernity, showing signs of resilience to cultural imports while producing a sense of 'modern Asia'. The reality of Asian film-making as well as film festival organization and participation points to a rather different case scenario--that which agrees with the idea that Western culture remains the reference point for modernization and that cultural verification is mainly sought after in the West. Such a conception, however, belongs to the pre-GM phase of modernization. In this paper, we discuss the various meanings of this situation by empirical analysis of Asian professionals and policy makers: are they engaged in subordination, subversion, or something else? Is polycentric festival culture a sign of CHANging power relations? We launch a critique of GM as a testable concept for research in cultural and economic geography, as time-space patterns in the film festival globalization help with some part of the answer. 2011-04-01T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/988 Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University film festivals global modernity Asia cities global networks Film and Media Studies Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic film festivals
global modernity
Asia
cities
global networks
Film and Media Studies
Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
spellingShingle film festivals
global modernity
Asia
cities
global networks
Film and Media Studies
Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies
VOGEL, Ann
Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?
description In the past two decades, film festivals have spread around the globe remarkably fast. They show high isomorphism in terms of organizational form, goals, programs and resourcing types, including strategies for institutional embedding in urban cultural policy planning contexts. At the same time they remain a highly stratified organizational population of which only the top tier--Western organizations--forms the core of the global festival circuit. According to global modernity (GM) scholars, we'd expect that Asian film festivals--part of the recent organizational founding wave--are active agents in the making of such a new modernity, showing signs of resilience to cultural imports while producing a sense of 'modern Asia'. The reality of Asian film-making as well as film festival organization and participation points to a rather different case scenario--that which agrees with the idea that Western culture remains the reference point for modernization and that cultural verification is mainly sought after in the West. Such a conception, however, belongs to the pre-GM phase of modernization. In this paper, we discuss the various meanings of this situation by empirical analysis of Asian professionals and policy makers: are they engaged in subordination, subversion, or something else? Is polycentric festival culture a sign of CHANging power relations? We launch a critique of GM as a testable concept for research in cultural and economic geography, as time-space patterns in the film festival globalization help with some part of the answer.
format text
author VOGEL, Ann
author_facet VOGEL, Ann
author_sort VOGEL, Ann
title Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?
title_short Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?
title_full Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?
title_fullStr Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?
title_full_unstemmed Film Festival Sprawl - Sign of Global Modernity?
title_sort film festival sprawl - sign of global modernity?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2011
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/988
_version_ 1770571047972634624