Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models
The present research tested 2 competing models specifying how 2 traits (concern with the well-being of others and self-control) interact to predict forgiveness. According to the compensatory model, forgiveness requires being high on either trait; according to the synergistic model, forgiveness requi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1122 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2378/viewcontent/BallietLiJoireman2012.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-2378 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-23782020-04-01T08:27:46Z Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models BALLIET, Daniel LI, Norman P. JOIREMAN, Jeff The present research tested 2 competing models specifying how 2 traits (concern with the well-being of others and self-control) interact to predict forgiveness. According to the compensatory model, forgiveness requires being high on either trait; according to the synergistic model, forgiveness requires being high on both traits. Two preliminary studies demonstrated the main effect of trait (Study 1a) and primed (Study 1b) self-control on forgiveness. Three primary studies consistently supported the compensatory model in predicting willingness to forgive a partner who behaves noncooperatively in a 2-alternative prisoner’s dilemma (Study 2), a continuous give-some dilemma (Study 3), and a 2-alternative maximizing difference game (Study 4). Among proselfs or those low in trait forgiveness, trait self-control positively related to forgiveness, suggesting that self-control can compensate for a lack of concern with others’ well-being. Implications for theory and research on forgiveness are discussed. 2011-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1122 info:doi/10.1037/a0024967 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2378/viewcontent/BallietLiJoireman2012.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University forgiveness social dilemmas social value orientation trait self-control Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
forgiveness social dilemmas social value orientation trait self-control Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology |
spellingShingle |
forgiveness social dilemmas social value orientation trait self-control Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology BALLIET, Daniel LI, Norman P. JOIREMAN, Jeff Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models |
description |
The present research tested 2 competing models specifying how 2 traits (concern with the well-being of others and self-control) interact to predict forgiveness. According to the compensatory model, forgiveness requires being high on either trait; according to the synergistic model, forgiveness requires being high on both traits. Two preliminary studies demonstrated the main effect of trait (Study 1a) and primed (Study 1b) self-control on forgiveness. Three primary studies consistently supported the compensatory model in predicting willingness to forgive a partner who behaves noncooperatively in a 2-alternative prisoner’s dilemma (Study 2), a continuous give-some dilemma (Study 3), and a 2-alternative maximizing difference game (Study 4). Among proselfs or those low in trait forgiveness, trait self-control positively related to forgiveness, suggesting that self-control can compensate for a lack of concern with others’ well-being. Implications for theory and research on forgiveness are discussed. |
format |
text |
author |
BALLIET, Daniel LI, Norman P. JOIREMAN, Jeff |
author_facet |
BALLIET, Daniel LI, Norman P. JOIREMAN, Jeff |
author_sort |
BALLIET, Daniel |
title |
Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models |
title_short |
Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models |
title_full |
Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models |
title_fullStr |
Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models |
title_sort |
relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: compensatory versus synergistic models |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1122 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2378/viewcontent/BallietLiJoireman2012.pdf |
_version_ |
1770571291170963456 |