The Backward Clock, truth-tracking, and safety
We present Backward Clock, an original counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis of propositional knowledge, which works differently from other putative counterexamples and avoids objections to which they are vulnerable. We then argue that four ways of analyzing knowledge in terms of...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | WILLIAMS, John N., SINHABABU, Neil |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1680 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2937/viewcontent/SINTBC_2.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
When Is a Belief True Because of Luck?
by: Greene, Preston
Published: (2016) -
On epistemological traditions, truths and proverbial frogs
by: Montemar, Louie C.
Published: (2006) -
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2016) -
Standard Gettier cases: A problem for Greco?
by: RYAN, Shane
Published: (2014) -
True Succession and Inheritance of Traditions: Looking Back on the Debate
by: WILLIAMS, John N.
Published: (2014)