The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions
The European Union (EU) has evolved a role in the management of crises provoked by states perceived to be in breach of the nuclear non-proliferation regime. At the outset of these non-proliferation efforts, the EU was criticized for the timidity of its reactions. More than 11 years after the adoptio...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1687 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2942/viewcontent/EUNPC_no_46.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-2942 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-29422015-09-15T06:08:05Z The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions PORTELA, Clara The European Union (EU) has evolved a role in the management of crises provoked by states perceived to be in breach of the nuclear non-proliferation regime. At the outset of these non-proliferation efforts, the EU was criticized for the timidity of its reactions. More than 11 years after the adoption in 2003 of its Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, has the EU managed to improve its performance in responding to nuclear proliferation crises? This policy brief examines how the EU has used the tools in its foreign policy toolbox to address nuclear proliferation crises and discovers that a steady evolution has taken place. The analysis shows that the EU has evolved from a marginal into a key actor over the course of different crises and that it has called upon a variety of tools in a range of crisis situations, from Ukraine to India and Pakistan, Iraq, North Korea and Iran. This policy brief specifically explores the nature of the instruments selected by the EU in the face of each of the challenges to the non-proliferation regime. It discusses the key factors accounting for the activation of the EU’s foreign policy toolbox following the adoption of its 2003 strategy, highlighting pressure by the United States and the legitimization of a United Nations Security Council mandate as determinants. 2015-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1687 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2942/viewcontent/EUNPC_no_46.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University European Union nuclear weapons sanctions Defense and Security Studies Eastern European Studies Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
European Union nuclear weapons sanctions Defense and Security Studies Eastern European Studies Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration |
spellingShingle |
European Union nuclear weapons sanctions Defense and Security Studies Eastern European Studies Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration PORTELA, Clara The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions |
description |
The European Union (EU) has evolved a role in the management of crises provoked by states perceived to be in breach of the nuclear non-proliferation regime. At the outset of these non-proliferation efforts, the EU was criticized for the timidity of its reactions. More than 11 years after the adoption in 2003 of its Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, has the EU managed to improve its performance in responding to nuclear proliferation crises? This policy brief examines how the EU has used the tools in its foreign policy toolbox to address nuclear proliferation crises and discovers that a steady evolution has taken place. The analysis shows that the EU has evolved from a marginal into a key actor over the course of different crises and that it has called upon a variety of tools in a range of crisis situations, from Ukraine to India and Pakistan, Iraq, North Korea and Iran. This policy brief specifically explores the nature of the instruments selected by the EU in the face of each of the challenges to the non-proliferation regime. It discusses the key factors accounting for the activation of the EU’s foreign policy toolbox following the adoption of its 2003 strategy, highlighting pressure by the United States and the legitimization of a United Nations Security Council mandate as determinants. |
format |
text |
author |
PORTELA, Clara |
author_facet |
PORTELA, Clara |
author_sort |
PORTELA, Clara |
title |
The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions |
title_short |
The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions |
title_full |
The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions |
title_fullStr |
The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The EU's Evolving Response to Nuclear Proliferation Crises: from Incentives to Sanctions |
title_sort |
eu's evolving response to nuclear proliferation crises: from incentives to sanctions |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1687 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/2942/viewcontent/EUNPC_no_46.pdf |
_version_ |
1770572567133814784 |