Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China

The development of markets and the penetration of capital into agriculture have started theagrarian transition in rural China, which is transforming smallholding, household-basedagriculture into various forms of capitalistic production. This raises again in a new historicaland social context the lon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHANG, Forrest Q., DONALDSON, John A.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2060
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3317&context=soss_research
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3317
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-33172018-02-27T05:40:04Z Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China ZHANG, Forrest Q. DONALDSON, John A. The development of markets and the penetration of capital into agriculture have started theagrarian transition in rural China, which is transforming smallholding, household-basedagriculture into various forms of capitalistic production. This raises again in a new historicaland social context the long-debated question in the agrarian transition literature: Can familyfarms survive the onslaught of capitalist agriculture based on wage labor and what shapes theconfrontation between family farms and agro-capital? I argue that it is the local politicaleconomy—rather than some natural obstacles in agriculture to the penetration of capitalism—that shapes this confrontation and gives rise to a variety of local patterns in how familyproducers interact with agro-capital. Conceptually, the primary dimension in which localpatterns diverge is how direct producers’ transactions with the product market are mediated.Based on this distinction, I identify three distinct local paths of agrarian transition—agribusiness-led corporate production, independent household production, and cooperativeproduction. I use data collected from fieldwork and secondary sources to show how, in eachmodel, characteristics of the local pattern are shaped by the local political economy. 2011-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2060 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3317&context=soss_research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University agrarian transition agribusiness family farming cooperatives capitalism China Agribusiness Agricultural and Resource Economics Asian Studies
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
country Singapore
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic agrarian transition
agribusiness
family farming
cooperatives
capitalism
China
Agribusiness
Agricultural and Resource Economics
Asian Studies
spellingShingle agrarian transition
agribusiness
family farming
cooperatives
capitalism
China
Agribusiness
Agricultural and Resource Economics
Asian Studies
ZHANG, Forrest Q.
DONALDSON, John A.
Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China
description The development of markets and the penetration of capital into agriculture have started theagrarian transition in rural China, which is transforming smallholding, household-basedagriculture into various forms of capitalistic production. This raises again in a new historicaland social context the long-debated question in the agrarian transition literature: Can familyfarms survive the onslaught of capitalist agriculture based on wage labor and what shapes theconfrontation between family farms and agro-capital? I argue that it is the local politicaleconomy—rather than some natural obstacles in agriculture to the penetration of capitalism—that shapes this confrontation and gives rise to a variety of local patterns in how familyproducers interact with agro-capital. Conceptually, the primary dimension in which localpatterns diverge is how direct producers’ transactions with the product market are mediated.Based on this distinction, I identify three distinct local paths of agrarian transition—agribusiness-led corporate production, independent household production, and cooperativeproduction. I use data collected from fieldwork and secondary sources to show how, in eachmodel, characteristics of the local pattern are shaped by the local political economy.
format text
author ZHANG, Forrest Q.
DONALDSON, John A.
author_facet ZHANG, Forrest Q.
DONALDSON, John A.
author_sort ZHANG, Forrest Q.
title Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China
title_short Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China
title_full Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China
title_fullStr Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China
title_full_unstemmed Comparing local models of Agrarian transition in China
title_sort comparing local models of agrarian transition in china
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2011
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2060
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3317&context=soss_research
_version_ 1681134716725493760