The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence

Across decades and cultures, researchers have found that men prefer physical attractiveness in their romantic partners more than women do, whereas women prefer social status and resources in their partners more than men do. From an evolutionary perspective, these sex differences are important as the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LI, Norman P., MELTZER, Andrea L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2202
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3459/viewcontent/LiMeltzer_ValiditySexDiffMatePref_2015.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3459
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-34592019-10-22T01:26:51Z The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence LI, Norman P. MELTZER, Andrea L. Across decades and cultures, researchers have found that men prefer physical attractiveness in their romantic partners more than women do, whereas women prefer social status and resources in their partners more than men do. From an evolutionary perspective, these sex differences are important as they reflect hypothesized psychological mechanisms that evolved in response to different adaptive challenges faced by ancestral men and women. Social psychologists, however, have recently challenged the validity of mate preferences and thus, this evolutionary perspective. Indeed, recent speed-dating studies (e.g., Eastwick and Finkel, 2008) and a meta-analysis (Eastwick, Luchies, Finkel, and Hunt, 2014) demonstrate that the sexes respond similarly to physical attractiveness and earning prospects in potential mates encountered live, as well as in ongoing relationships. Here, we review (a) the mate preferences literature and associated evolutionary perspective, (b) the recent challenge to this work, (c) issues that have arisen with the challenge, and (d) empirical work that we have undertaken to respond to those issues and to demonstrate that the sex-differentiated mate selection processes do indeed occur in initial mating contexts and ongoing, long-term relationships. We then conclude by discussing various remaining issues and considerations, as well as future directions. 2015-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2202 info:doi/10.1037/ebs0000036 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3459/viewcontent/LiMeltzer_ValiditySexDiffMatePref_2015.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Long-term mating Mate selection Mate preferences Speed dating Romantic relationships Gender and Sexuality Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Long-term mating
Mate selection
Mate preferences
Speed dating
Romantic relationships
Gender and Sexuality
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
spellingShingle Long-term mating
Mate selection
Mate preferences
Speed dating
Romantic relationships
Gender and Sexuality
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
LI, Norman P.
MELTZER, Andrea L.
The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
description Across decades and cultures, researchers have found that men prefer physical attractiveness in their romantic partners more than women do, whereas women prefer social status and resources in their partners more than men do. From an evolutionary perspective, these sex differences are important as they reflect hypothesized psychological mechanisms that evolved in response to different adaptive challenges faced by ancestral men and women. Social psychologists, however, have recently challenged the validity of mate preferences and thus, this evolutionary perspective. Indeed, recent speed-dating studies (e.g., Eastwick and Finkel, 2008) and a meta-analysis (Eastwick, Luchies, Finkel, and Hunt, 2014) demonstrate that the sexes respond similarly to physical attractiveness and earning prospects in potential mates encountered live, as well as in ongoing relationships. Here, we review (a) the mate preferences literature and associated evolutionary perspective, (b) the recent challenge to this work, (c) issues that have arisen with the challenge, and (d) empirical work that we have undertaken to respond to those issues and to demonstrate that the sex-differentiated mate selection processes do indeed occur in initial mating contexts and ongoing, long-term relationships. We then conclude by discussing various remaining issues and considerations, as well as future directions.
format text
author LI, Norman P.
MELTZER, Andrea L.
author_facet LI, Norman P.
MELTZER, Andrea L.
author_sort LI, Norman P.
title The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
title_short The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
title_full The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
title_fullStr The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
title_full_unstemmed The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
title_sort validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2015
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2202
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3459/viewcontent/LiMeltzer_ValiditySexDiffMatePref_2015.pdf
_version_ 1770573529160351744