The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence
Across decades and cultures, researchers have found that men prefer physical attractiveness in their romantic partners more than women do, whereas women prefer social status and resources in their partners more than men do. From an evolutionary perspective, these sex differences are important as the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2202 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3459/viewcontent/LiMeltzer_ValiditySexDiffMatePref_2015.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3459 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-34592019-10-22T01:26:51Z The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence LI, Norman P. MELTZER, Andrea L. Across decades and cultures, researchers have found that men prefer physical attractiveness in their romantic partners more than women do, whereas women prefer social status and resources in their partners more than men do. From an evolutionary perspective, these sex differences are important as they reflect hypothesized psychological mechanisms that evolved in response to different adaptive challenges faced by ancestral men and women. Social psychologists, however, have recently challenged the validity of mate preferences and thus, this evolutionary perspective. Indeed, recent speed-dating studies (e.g., Eastwick and Finkel, 2008) and a meta-analysis (Eastwick, Luchies, Finkel, and Hunt, 2014) demonstrate that the sexes respond similarly to physical attractiveness and earning prospects in potential mates encountered live, as well as in ongoing relationships. Here, we review (a) the mate preferences literature and associated evolutionary perspective, (b) the recent challenge to this work, (c) issues that have arisen with the challenge, and (d) empirical work that we have undertaken to respond to those issues and to demonstrate that the sex-differentiated mate selection processes do indeed occur in initial mating contexts and ongoing, long-term relationships. We then conclude by discussing various remaining issues and considerations, as well as future directions. 2015-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2202 info:doi/10.1037/ebs0000036 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3459/viewcontent/LiMeltzer_ValiditySexDiffMatePref_2015.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Long-term mating Mate selection Mate preferences Speed dating Romantic relationships Gender and Sexuality Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Long-term mating Mate selection Mate preferences Speed dating Romantic relationships Gender and Sexuality Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology |
spellingShingle |
Long-term mating Mate selection Mate preferences Speed dating Romantic relationships Gender and Sexuality Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology LI, Norman P. MELTZER, Andrea L. The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
description |
Across decades and cultures, researchers have found that men prefer physical attractiveness in their romantic partners more than women do, whereas women prefer social status and resources in their partners more than men do. From an evolutionary perspective, these sex differences are important as they reflect hypothesized psychological mechanisms that evolved in response to different adaptive challenges faced by ancestral men and women. Social psychologists, however, have recently challenged the validity of mate preferences and thus, this evolutionary perspective. Indeed, recent speed-dating studies (e.g., Eastwick and Finkel, 2008) and a meta-analysis (Eastwick, Luchies, Finkel, and Hunt, 2014) demonstrate that the sexes respond similarly to physical attractiveness and earning prospects in potential mates encountered live, as well as in ongoing relationships. Here, we review (a) the mate preferences literature and associated evolutionary perspective, (b) the recent challenge to this work, (c) issues that have arisen with the challenge, and (d) empirical work that we have undertaken to respond to those issues and to demonstrate that the sex-differentiated mate selection processes do indeed occur in initial mating contexts and ongoing, long-term relationships. We then conclude by discussing various remaining issues and considerations, as well as future directions. |
format |
text |
author |
LI, Norman P. MELTZER, Andrea L. |
author_facet |
LI, Norman P. MELTZER, Andrea L. |
author_sort |
LI, Norman P. |
title |
The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
title_short |
The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
title_full |
The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
title_fullStr |
The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
title_sort |
validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2202 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3459/viewcontent/LiMeltzer_ValiditySexDiffMatePref_2015.pdf |
_version_ |
1770573529160351744 |