Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization

This paper examines how the domestic reception of global corporate responsibility is significantly shaped by institutionalized differences among state, business and civil society actors in the domestic context. In the global diffusion of ideas and practices, the decoupling of global policies and dom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LIM, Alwyn
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2311
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3568/viewcontent/Global_corporate_responsibility_in_domestic_context_lateral_decoupling_and_organizational_responses_to_globalization__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3568
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-35682017-10-06T07:33:39Z Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization LIM, Alwyn This paper examines how the domestic reception of global corporate responsibility is significantly shaped by institutionalized differences among state, business and civil society actors in the domestic context. In the global diffusion of ideas and practices, the decoupling of global policies and domestic practice is endemic, a process that this paper argues results from competing domestic interests and orientations. I examine this process of ‘lateral decoupling’ in a case study of the reception of the United Nations Global Compact among corporate responsibility practitioners in the city-state of Singapore. Differences in ceremonial, pragmatic and non-adversarial orientations towards global corporate responsibility generated significant uncertainty for businesses around how to apply corporate responsibility principles. In response, businesses constructed distinct narratives: large transnational and domestic companies emphasized values, community and tradition, while small businesses focused on the competitive advantages of corporate responsibility. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of domesticinstitutions for mediating global principles and local outcomes. 2017-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2311 info:doi/10.1080/03085147.2017.1359439 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3568/viewcontent/Global_corporate_responsibility_in_domestic_context_lateral_decoupling_and_organizational_responses_to_globalization__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University corporate responsibility decoupling domestic institutions globalization Social Psychology and Interaction Work, Economy and Organizations
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic corporate responsibility
decoupling
domestic institutions
globalization
Social Psychology and Interaction
Work, Economy and Organizations
spellingShingle corporate responsibility
decoupling
domestic institutions
globalization
Social Psychology and Interaction
Work, Economy and Organizations
LIM, Alwyn
Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
description This paper examines how the domestic reception of global corporate responsibility is significantly shaped by institutionalized differences among state, business and civil society actors in the domestic context. In the global diffusion of ideas and practices, the decoupling of global policies and domestic practice is endemic, a process that this paper argues results from competing domestic interests and orientations. I examine this process of ‘lateral decoupling’ in a case study of the reception of the United Nations Global Compact among corporate responsibility practitioners in the city-state of Singapore. Differences in ceremonial, pragmatic and non-adversarial orientations towards global corporate responsibility generated significant uncertainty for businesses around how to apply corporate responsibility principles. In response, businesses constructed distinct narratives: large transnational and domestic companies emphasized values, community and tradition, while small businesses focused on the competitive advantages of corporate responsibility. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of domesticinstitutions for mediating global principles and local outcomes.
format text
author LIM, Alwyn
author_facet LIM, Alwyn
author_sort LIM, Alwyn
title Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
title_short Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
title_full Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
title_fullStr Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
title_full_unstemmed Global corporate responsibility in domestic context: Lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
title_sort global corporate responsibility in domestic context: lateral decoupling and organizational responses to globalization
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2311
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3568/viewcontent/Global_corporate_responsibility_in_domestic_context_lateral_decoupling_and_organizational_responses_to_globalization__1_.pdf
_version_ 1770573755676884992