The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox
Over the past decade, much has been written about the potential of smart urbanism to bring about various and lasting forms of betterment. The embedding of digital technologies within urban infrastructures has been well documented, and the efficiencies of smart models of urban governance and manageme...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2423 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3680/viewcontent/Ideological_alignment_of_smart_urbanism_in_Singapore.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3680 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-36802020-01-15T01:04:41Z The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando Over the past decade, much has been written about the potential of smart urbanism to bring about various and lasting forms of betterment. The embedding of digital technologies within urban infrastructures has been well documented, and the efficiencies of smart models of urban governance and management have been lauded. More recently, however, the discourse has been labelled ‘hegemonic’, and accused of developing a view of smart technology that is blinkered by its failure to critique its socio-political effects. By focusing on the case of Singapore’s ‘Smart Nation’ initiative, this paper embraces the paradoxes at the heart of smart urbanism and, in doing so, interrogates the tension between ideology and praxis, efficiency and control, access and choice, and smart governance and smart citizenship. It also demonstrates how such tensions are (re)produced through ‘fourthspace’ – the digitally enabled spaces of urbanism that are co-created, and that contribute to an expansion and diffusion of social and political responsibility. It ends by suggesting how such spaces have the potential to radically transform not just the urban environment, but also the role of government and citizens in designing urban futures. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2423 info:doi/10.1177/0042098017746528 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3680/viewcontent/Ideological_alignment_of_smart_urbanism_in_Singapore.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University governance Singapore smart nation smart urbanism urban futures urban infrastructures Asian Studies Science and Technology Studies Urban Studies and Planning |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
governance Singapore smart nation smart urbanism urban futures urban infrastructures Asian Studies Science and Technology Studies Urban Studies and Planning |
spellingShingle |
governance Singapore smart nation smart urbanism urban futures urban infrastructures Asian Studies Science and Technology Studies Urban Studies and Planning KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox |
description |
Over the past decade, much has been written about the potential of smart urbanism to bring about various and lasting forms of betterment. The embedding of digital technologies within urban infrastructures has been well documented, and the efficiencies of smart models of urban governance and management have been lauded. More recently, however, the discourse has been labelled ‘hegemonic’, and accused of developing a view of smart technology that is blinkered by its failure to critique its socio-political effects. By focusing on the case of Singapore’s ‘Smart Nation’ initiative, this paper embraces the paradoxes at the heart of smart urbanism and, in doing so, interrogates the tension between ideology and praxis, efficiency and control, access and choice, and smart governance and smart citizenship. It also demonstrates how such tensions are (re)produced through ‘fourthspace’ – the digitally enabled spaces of urbanism that are co-created, and that contribute to an expansion and diffusion of social and political responsibility. It ends by suggesting how such spaces have the potential to radically transform not just the urban environment, but also the role of government and citizens in designing urban futures. |
format |
text |
author |
KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando |
author_facet |
KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando |
author_sort |
KONG, Lily |
title |
The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox |
title_short |
The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox |
title_full |
The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox |
title_fullStr |
The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox |
title_full_unstemmed |
The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox |
title_sort |
ideological alignment of smart urbanism in singapore: critical reflections on a political paradox |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2423 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3680/viewcontent/Ideological_alignment_of_smart_urbanism_in_Singapore.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574033666965504 |