Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma

Organizations increasingly rely on team-based work systems-yet intergroup behavior is predisposed toward competition, which can render conflict management in organizations especially difficult. Based on the integrative complexity model of group decision-making and the literature on intergroup social...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: PARK, Guihyun, DESHON, Richard P.
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2485
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3742/viewcontent/Effects_group_discussion_integrative_afv_2018.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Singapore Management University
語言: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3742
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-37422019-05-23T08:30:25Z Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma PARK, Guihyun DESHON, Richard P. Organizations increasingly rely on team-based work systems-yet intergroup behavior is predisposed toward competition, which can render conflict management in organizations especially difficult. Based on the integrative complexity model of group decision-making and the literature on intergroup social dilemmas, we argue that a lack of quality group discussion (i.e., low integrative complexity) can heighten group members' sense of greed toward and fear of other groups-and, by doing so, increase the likelihood that a group will decide to compete. Accordingly, we propose and evaluate two interventions that target group-discussion dynamics to promote the integrative complexity of group discussion and intergroup cooperation: structured group discussion and discussion led by a group member who favors cooperation. Two hundred eighty-five participants were assigned to groups of three and played an iterated prisoner's dilemma game. Results demonstrate that participating in a structured group discussion increased the integrative complexity of group discussion, during which different perspectives were fully deliberated before making a final decision. This, in turn, decreased the sense of greed and fear, and reduced the likelihood that a group would decide to compete against other groups. In contrast, a cooperative discussion leader was only helpful in reducing group decisions to compete in the first round: Because it did not increase the integrative complexity of group discussion, this method failed to motivate cooperation over time. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. 2018-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2485 info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.04.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3742/viewcontent/Effects_group_discussion_integrative_afv_2018.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Industrial and Organizational Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Industrial and Organizational Psychology
spellingShingle Industrial and Organizational Psychology
PARK, Guihyun
DESHON, Richard P.
Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
description Organizations increasingly rely on team-based work systems-yet intergroup behavior is predisposed toward competition, which can render conflict management in organizations especially difficult. Based on the integrative complexity model of group decision-making and the literature on intergroup social dilemmas, we argue that a lack of quality group discussion (i.e., low integrative complexity) can heighten group members' sense of greed toward and fear of other groups-and, by doing so, increase the likelihood that a group will decide to compete. Accordingly, we propose and evaluate two interventions that target group-discussion dynamics to promote the integrative complexity of group discussion and intergroup cooperation: structured group discussion and discussion led by a group member who favors cooperation. Two hundred eighty-five participants were assigned to groups of three and played an iterated prisoner's dilemma game. Results demonstrate that participating in a structured group discussion increased the integrative complexity of group discussion, during which different perspectives were fully deliberated before making a final decision. This, in turn, decreased the sense of greed and fear, and reduced the likelihood that a group would decide to compete against other groups. In contrast, a cooperative discussion leader was only helpful in reducing group decisions to compete in the first round: Because it did not increase the integrative complexity of group discussion, this method failed to motivate cooperation over time. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
format text
author PARK, Guihyun
DESHON, Richard P.
author_facet PARK, Guihyun
DESHON, Richard P.
author_sort PARK, Guihyun
title Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
title_short Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
title_full Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
title_fullStr Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
title_full_unstemmed Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
title_sort effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2485
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3742/viewcontent/Effects_group_discussion_integrative_afv_2018.pdf
_version_ 1770574159026323456