Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach

This article provides a synthesized, workable framework for analyzing national energy security policies and performance. Drawn from research interviews, survey results, a focused workshop, and an extensive literature review, this article proposes that energy security ought to be comprised of five di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SOVACOOL, Benjamin K., MUKHERJEE, Ishani
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2512
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3769/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0360544211004294_main.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3769
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-37692018-07-13T08:28:26Z Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach SOVACOOL, Benjamin K. MUKHERJEE, Ishani This article provides a synthesized, workable framework for analyzing national energy security policies and performance. Drawn from research interviews, survey results, a focused workshop, and an extensive literature review, this article proposes that energy security ought to be comprised of five dimensions related to availability, affordability, technology development, sustainability, and regulation. We then break these five dimensions down into 20 components related to security of supply and production, dependency, and diversification for availability; price stability, access and equity, decentralization, and low prices for affordability; innovation and research, safety and reliability, resilience, energy efficiency, and investment for technology development; land use, water, climate change, and air pollution for sustainability; and governance, trade, competition, and knowledge for sound regulation. Further still, our synthesis lists 320 simple indicators and 52 complex indicators that policymakers and scholars can use to analyze, measure, track, and compare national performance on energy security. The article concludes by offering implications for energy policy more broadly. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2011-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2512 info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3769/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0360544211004294_main.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Energy security Security of supply Energy poverty Energy and Utilities Law Energy Policy Political Science
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Energy security
Security of supply
Energy poverty
Energy and Utilities Law
Energy Policy
Political Science
spellingShingle Energy security
Security of supply
Energy poverty
Energy and Utilities Law
Energy Policy
Political Science
SOVACOOL, Benjamin K.
MUKHERJEE, Ishani
Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach
description This article provides a synthesized, workable framework for analyzing national energy security policies and performance. Drawn from research interviews, survey results, a focused workshop, and an extensive literature review, this article proposes that energy security ought to be comprised of five dimensions related to availability, affordability, technology development, sustainability, and regulation. We then break these five dimensions down into 20 components related to security of supply and production, dependency, and diversification for availability; price stability, access and equity, decentralization, and low prices for affordability; innovation and research, safety and reliability, resilience, energy efficiency, and investment for technology development; land use, water, climate change, and air pollution for sustainability; and governance, trade, competition, and knowledge for sound regulation. Further still, our synthesis lists 320 simple indicators and 52 complex indicators that policymakers and scholars can use to analyze, measure, track, and compare national performance on energy security. The article concludes by offering implications for energy policy more broadly. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
format text
author SOVACOOL, Benjamin K.
MUKHERJEE, Ishani
author_facet SOVACOOL, Benjamin K.
MUKHERJEE, Ishani
author_sort SOVACOOL, Benjamin K.
title Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach
title_short Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach
title_full Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach
title_fullStr Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach
title_sort conceptualizing and measuring energy security: a synthesized approach
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2011
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2512
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3769/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0360544211004294_main.pdf
_version_ 1770574221909426176