Patient-relativity in morality

It is common to distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are agent-relative from those that are agent-neutral. One can also distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are moment-relative from those that are moment-neutral. In this article, I introduce a third distinction that stands al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HAMMERTON, Matthew
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2525
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3782/viewcontent/687330.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3782
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-37822018-07-27T03:22:02Z Patient-relativity in morality HAMMERTON, Matthew It is common to distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are agent-relative from those that are agent-neutral. One can also distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are moment-relative from those that are moment-neutral. In this article, I introduce a third distinction that stands alongside these two distinctions—the distinction between moral rules, reasons, or values that are patient-relative and those that are patient-neutral. I then show how patient-relativity plays an important role in several moral theories, gives us a better understanding of agent-relativity and moment-relativity, and provides a novel objection to Derek Parfit’s “appeal to full relativity” argument. 2016-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2525 info:doi/10.1086/687330 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3782/viewcontent/687330.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University agent-relative time-relative moment-relative patient-relative appeal to full relativity patient-relativity patient-neutral patient-neutrality Philosophy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic agent-relative
time-relative
moment-relative
patient-relative
appeal to full relativity
patient-relativity
patient-neutral
patient-neutrality
Philosophy
spellingShingle agent-relative
time-relative
moment-relative
patient-relative
appeal to full relativity
patient-relativity
patient-neutral
patient-neutrality
Philosophy
HAMMERTON, Matthew
Patient-relativity in morality
description It is common to distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are agent-relative from those that are agent-neutral. One can also distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are moment-relative from those that are moment-neutral. In this article, I introduce a third distinction that stands alongside these two distinctions—the distinction between moral rules, reasons, or values that are patient-relative and those that are patient-neutral. I then show how patient-relativity plays an important role in several moral theories, gives us a better understanding of agent-relativity and moment-relativity, and provides a novel objection to Derek Parfit’s “appeal to full relativity” argument.
format text
author HAMMERTON, Matthew
author_facet HAMMERTON, Matthew
author_sort HAMMERTON, Matthew
title Patient-relativity in morality
title_short Patient-relativity in morality
title_full Patient-relativity in morality
title_fullStr Patient-relativity in morality
title_full_unstemmed Patient-relativity in morality
title_sort patient-relativity in morality
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2016
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2525
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3782/viewcontent/687330.pdf
_version_ 1770574246378995712