China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China

In the 1920s, John Dewey’s followers in China, led by his student HuShih, attempted to put his pragmatism into practice in their quest for democracy.This essay compares Hu Shih’s thought, especially his emphasis on pragmatism asmethod, with Dewey’s philosophical positions and evaluates Hu’s achievem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TAN, Sor-hoon
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2539
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3796/viewcontent/Tan_2004_Metaphilosophy__1___1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3796
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-37962018-08-16T09:04:46Z China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China TAN, Sor-hoon In the 1920s, John Dewey’s followers in China, led by his student HuShih, attempted to put his pragmatism into practice in their quest for democracy.This essay compares Hu Shih’s thought, especially his emphasis on pragmatism asmethod, with Dewey’s philosophical positions and evaluates Hu’s achievement asa pragmatist in the context of the tumultuous times he lived in. It assesses Hu’sclaim that the means to democracy lies in education rather than politics, sincedemocracy as a way of life requires a cultural renewal beyond institutionalchanges. It argues that a problem-centered approach to social change does notpreclude radical action, even revolution. But pragmatism is against gratuitous useof violence in the service of wholesale and abstract ideals advocated by various‘‘isms.’’ While Hu’s experiment of democracy in China is a significant episode inthe history of pragmatism, its ‘‘failure’’ does not prove that there are inherentflaws in the pragmatist method, that pragmatism is unviable for China. Thefailure needs to be understood in the context of the pragmatist conception ofexperiment, in which failures are to be expected; what is important is to learnfrom them to achieve better results in the next stage of inquiry. Hu Shih’spragmatism contains lessons for pragmatists and for those interested in thecontinued quest for democracy in ChinaFthe experiment continues. 2004-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2539 info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00305.x https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3796/viewcontent/Tan_2004_Metaphilosophy__1___1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Hu Shih John Dewey democracy China May Fourth movement method educational reforms Chinese pragmatism Arts and Humanities
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Hu Shih
John Dewey
democracy
China
May Fourth movement
method
educational reforms
Chinese pragmatism
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Hu Shih
John Dewey
democracy
China
May Fourth movement
method
educational reforms
Chinese pragmatism
Arts and Humanities
TAN, Sor-hoon
China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China
description In the 1920s, John Dewey’s followers in China, led by his student HuShih, attempted to put his pragmatism into practice in their quest for democracy.This essay compares Hu Shih’s thought, especially his emphasis on pragmatism asmethod, with Dewey’s philosophical positions and evaluates Hu’s achievement asa pragmatist in the context of the tumultuous times he lived in. It assesses Hu’sclaim that the means to democracy lies in education rather than politics, sincedemocracy as a way of life requires a cultural renewal beyond institutionalchanges. It argues that a problem-centered approach to social change does notpreclude radical action, even revolution. But pragmatism is against gratuitous useof violence in the service of wholesale and abstract ideals advocated by various‘‘isms.’’ While Hu’s experiment of democracy in China is a significant episode inthe history of pragmatism, its ‘‘failure’’ does not prove that there are inherentflaws in the pragmatist method, that pragmatism is unviable for China. Thefailure needs to be understood in the context of the pragmatist conception ofexperiment, in which failures are to be expected; what is important is to learnfrom them to achieve better results in the next stage of inquiry. Hu Shih’spragmatism contains lessons for pragmatists and for those interested in thecontinued quest for democracy in ChinaFthe experiment continues.
format text
author TAN, Sor-hoon
author_facet TAN, Sor-hoon
author_sort TAN, Sor-hoon
title China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China
title_short China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China
title_full China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China
title_fullStr China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China
title_full_unstemmed China’s pragmatist experiment: Hu Shih’s pragmatism and Dewey’s influence in China
title_sort china’s pragmatist experiment: hu shih’s pragmatism and dewey’s influence in china
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2004
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2539
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3796/viewcontent/Tan_2004_Metaphilosophy__1___1_.pdf
_version_ 1770574249407283200