Why equality? Which inequalities?

This article challenges the conventional view that Confucianism has no place for the value of equality by shifting the focus from direct justification of equality (Why equality?) to concerns about actual social and political problems (Which inequalities are objectionable?). From this perspective, ea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TAN, Sor-hoon
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2606
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3863/viewcontent/Why_Equality_Which_Inequalities_av_2016.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3863
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-38632020-11-11T05:45:52Z Why equality? Which inequalities? TAN, Sor-hoon This article challenges the conventional view that Confucianism has no place for the value of equality by shifting the focus from direct justification of equality (Why equality?) to concerns about actual social and political problems (Which inequalities are objectionable?). From this perspective, early Confucian texts endorse some inequalities, in particular those based on virtue, while objecting to others, especially socioeconomic inequalities. Confucians do not consider equality or inequality as inherently valuable, but evaluate them in relation to issues of good government. 2016-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2606 info:doi/10.1353/pew.2016.0048 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3863/viewcontent/Why_Equality_Which_Inequalities_av_2016.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Philosophy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Philosophy
spellingShingle Philosophy
TAN, Sor-hoon
Why equality? Which inequalities?
description This article challenges the conventional view that Confucianism has no place for the value of equality by shifting the focus from direct justification of equality (Why equality?) to concerns about actual social and political problems (Which inequalities are objectionable?). From this perspective, early Confucian texts endorse some inequalities, in particular those based on virtue, while objecting to others, especially socioeconomic inequalities. Confucians do not consider equality or inequality as inherently valuable, but evaluate them in relation to issues of good government.
format text
author TAN, Sor-hoon
author_facet TAN, Sor-hoon
author_sort TAN, Sor-hoon
title Why equality? Which inequalities?
title_short Why equality? Which inequalities?
title_full Why equality? Which inequalities?
title_fullStr Why equality? Which inequalities?
title_full_unstemmed Why equality? Which inequalities?
title_sort why equality? which inequalities?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2016
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2606
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3863/viewcontent/Why_Equality_Which_Inequalities_av_2016.pdf
_version_ 1770574274741927936