Why equality? Which inequalities?
This article challenges the conventional view that Confucianism has no place for the value of equality by shifting the focus from direct justification of equality (Why equality?) to concerns about actual social and political problems (Which inequalities are objectionable?). From this perspective, ea...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2606 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3863/viewcontent/Why_Equality_Which_Inequalities_av_2016.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3863 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-38632020-11-11T05:45:52Z Why equality? Which inequalities? TAN, Sor-hoon This article challenges the conventional view that Confucianism has no place for the value of equality by shifting the focus from direct justification of equality (Why equality?) to concerns about actual social and political problems (Which inequalities are objectionable?). From this perspective, early Confucian texts endorse some inequalities, in particular those based on virtue, while objecting to others, especially socioeconomic inequalities. Confucians do not consider equality or inequality as inherently valuable, but evaluate them in relation to issues of good government. 2016-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2606 info:doi/10.1353/pew.2016.0048 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3863/viewcontent/Why_Equality_Which_Inequalities_av_2016.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Philosophy |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy TAN, Sor-hoon Why equality? Which inequalities? |
description |
This article challenges the conventional view that Confucianism has no place for the value of equality by shifting the focus from direct justification of equality (Why equality?) to concerns about actual social and political problems (Which inequalities are objectionable?). From this perspective, early Confucian texts endorse some inequalities, in particular those based on virtue, while objecting to others, especially socioeconomic inequalities. Confucians do not consider equality or inequality as inherently valuable, but evaluate them in relation to issues of good government. |
format |
text |
author |
TAN, Sor-hoon |
author_facet |
TAN, Sor-hoon |
author_sort |
TAN, Sor-hoon |
title |
Why equality? Which inequalities? |
title_short |
Why equality? Which inequalities? |
title_full |
Why equality? Which inequalities? |
title_fullStr |
Why equality? Which inequalities? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why equality? Which inequalities? |
title_sort |
why equality? which inequalities? |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2606 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3863/viewcontent/Why_Equality_Which_Inequalities_av_2016.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574274741927936 |