Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins

Around the world, smart technologies are being embraced as a cost-efficient means of enabling the elderly to be cared for in new, more non-proximate ways. They can facilitate ageing-in-place, and have the potential to relieve pressure on the providers of care. Yet, the fact is that the interface of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KONG, Lily, WOODS, Orlando
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2659
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3916/viewcontent/1_s20_S0890406518302287_main.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3916
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-39162020-04-29T05:05:17Z Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando Around the world, smart technologies are being embraced as a cost-efficient means of enabling the elderly to be cared for in new, more non-proximate ways. They can facilitate ageing-in-place, and have the potential to relieve pressure on the providers of care. Yet, the fact is that the interface of technology and society is a negotiated one. These negotiations are most acutely felt when technology is used to supplement the hitherto human-centred process of caregiving, especially amongst “marginalised” societal cohorts, like the elderly. With this, there is a need to better understand the ways in which smart eldercare technologies are used, misused, or not used by those that they are designed to benefit. Drawing on qualitative data derived from triallists of three smart eldercare technologies in Singapore, this paper explores how the lived experience of smart eldercare can cause agentic and apathetic behaviours towards technology to manifest. Specifically, we identify four expectations – of understanding, response, compliance and appreciation – that undermine the potential beneficence of smart eldercare. To conclude, we emphasise the need for more collaborative, and more contextually-sensitive, approaches to the design, development and implementation of smart eldercare solutions. 2018-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2659 info:doi/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.08.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3916/viewcontent/1_s20_S0890406518302287_main.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Smart technology Eldercare Margins Home Ageing-in-place Singapore Asian Studies Gerontology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Sociology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Smart technology
Eldercare
Margins
Home
Ageing-in-place
Singapore
Asian Studies
Gerontology
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Sociology
spellingShingle Smart technology
Eldercare
Margins
Home
Ageing-in-place
Singapore
Asian Studies
Gerontology
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Sociology
KONG, Lily
WOODS, Orlando
Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
description Around the world, smart technologies are being embraced as a cost-efficient means of enabling the elderly to be cared for in new, more non-proximate ways. They can facilitate ageing-in-place, and have the potential to relieve pressure on the providers of care. Yet, the fact is that the interface of technology and society is a negotiated one. These negotiations are most acutely felt when technology is used to supplement the hitherto human-centred process of caregiving, especially amongst “marginalised” societal cohorts, like the elderly. With this, there is a need to better understand the ways in which smart eldercare technologies are used, misused, or not used by those that they are designed to benefit. Drawing on qualitative data derived from triallists of three smart eldercare technologies in Singapore, this paper explores how the lived experience of smart eldercare can cause agentic and apathetic behaviours towards technology to manifest. Specifically, we identify four expectations – of understanding, response, compliance and appreciation – that undermine the potential beneficence of smart eldercare. To conclude, we emphasise the need for more collaborative, and more contextually-sensitive, approaches to the design, development and implementation of smart eldercare solutions.
format text
author KONG, Lily
WOODS, Orlando
author_facet KONG, Lily
WOODS, Orlando
author_sort KONG, Lily
title Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
title_short Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
title_full Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
title_fullStr Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
title_full_unstemmed Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
title_sort smart eldercare in singapore: negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2659
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3916/viewcontent/1_s20_S0890406518302287_main.pdf
_version_ 1770574292568768512