Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins
Around the world, smart technologies are being embraced as a cost-efficient means of enabling the elderly to be cared for in new, more non-proximate ways. They can facilitate ageing-in-place, and have the potential to relieve pressure on the providers of care. Yet, the fact is that the interface of...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2659 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3916/viewcontent/1_s20_S0890406518302287_main.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3916 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-39162020-04-29T05:05:17Z Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando Around the world, smart technologies are being embraced as a cost-efficient means of enabling the elderly to be cared for in new, more non-proximate ways. They can facilitate ageing-in-place, and have the potential to relieve pressure on the providers of care. Yet, the fact is that the interface of technology and society is a negotiated one. These negotiations are most acutely felt when technology is used to supplement the hitherto human-centred process of caregiving, especially amongst “marginalised” societal cohorts, like the elderly. With this, there is a need to better understand the ways in which smart eldercare technologies are used, misused, or not used by those that they are designed to benefit. Drawing on qualitative data derived from triallists of three smart eldercare technologies in Singapore, this paper explores how the lived experience of smart eldercare can cause agentic and apathetic behaviours towards technology to manifest. Specifically, we identify four expectations – of understanding, response, compliance and appreciation – that undermine the potential beneficence of smart eldercare. To conclude, we emphasise the need for more collaborative, and more contextually-sensitive, approaches to the design, development and implementation of smart eldercare solutions. 2018-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2659 info:doi/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.08.001 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3916/viewcontent/1_s20_S0890406518302287_main.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Smart technology Eldercare Margins Home Ageing-in-place Singapore Asian Studies Gerontology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Sociology |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Smart technology Eldercare Margins Home Ageing-in-place Singapore Asian Studies Gerontology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Sociology |
spellingShingle |
Smart technology Eldercare Margins Home Ageing-in-place Singapore Asian Studies Gerontology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Sociology KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
description |
Around the world, smart technologies are being embraced as a cost-efficient means of enabling the elderly to be cared for in new, more non-proximate ways. They can facilitate ageing-in-place, and have the potential to relieve pressure on the providers of care. Yet, the fact is that the interface of technology and society is a negotiated one. These negotiations are most acutely felt when technology is used to supplement the hitherto human-centred process of caregiving, especially amongst “marginalised” societal cohorts, like the elderly. With this, there is a need to better understand the ways in which smart eldercare technologies are used, misused, or not used by those that they are designed to benefit. Drawing on qualitative data derived from triallists of three smart eldercare technologies in Singapore, this paper explores how the lived experience of smart eldercare can cause agentic and apathetic behaviours towards technology to manifest. Specifically, we identify four expectations – of understanding, response, compliance and appreciation – that undermine the potential beneficence of smart eldercare. To conclude, we emphasise the need for more collaborative, and more contextually-sensitive, approaches to the design, development and implementation of smart eldercare solutions. |
format |
text |
author |
KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando |
author_facet |
KONG, Lily WOODS, Orlando |
author_sort |
KONG, Lily |
title |
Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
title_short |
Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
title_full |
Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
title_fullStr |
Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
title_sort |
smart eldercare in singapore: negotiating agency and apathy at the margins |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2659 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3916/viewcontent/1_s20_S0890406518302287_main.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574292568768512 |