Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users

Using data from 13,789 Facebook users across U.S. states, this study examined the main effects of societal-level cultural tightness–looseness and its interaction effects with individuals’ social network density on impression management (IM) in terms of online emotional expression. Results showed tha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIU, Pan, CHAN, David, QIU, Lin, TOV, William, TONG, Victor Joo Chuan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2702
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3959/viewcontent/0146167218770999.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-3959
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-39592019-06-18T14:50:32Z Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users LIU, Pan CHAN, David QIU, Lin TOV, William TONG, Victor Joo Chuan Using data from 13,789 Facebook users across U.S. states, this study examined the main effects of societal-level cultural tightness–looseness and its interaction effects with individuals’ social network density on impression management (IM) in terms of online emotional expression. Results showed that individuals from culturally tight (vs. loose) states were more likely to express positive emotions and less likely to express negative emotions. Meanwhile, for positive emotional expression, there was a tightness–looseness by social network density interaction effect. In culturally tight states, individuals with dense (vs. sparse) networks were more likely to express positive emotions, while in culturally loose states this pattern was reversed. For negative emotional expression, however, no such interaction was observed. Our findings highlight the influence of cultural norms and social network structure on emotional expressions as IM strategies. 2018-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2702 info:doi/10.1177/0146167218770999 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3959/viewcontent/0146167218770999.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Cultural tightness-looseness Emotional expression Impression management Social network density Applied Behavior Analysis Social Media Sociology of Culture
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Cultural tightness-looseness
Emotional expression
Impression management
Social network density
Applied Behavior Analysis
Social Media
Sociology of Culture
spellingShingle Cultural tightness-looseness
Emotional expression
Impression management
Social network density
Applied Behavior Analysis
Social Media
Sociology of Culture
LIU, Pan
CHAN, David
QIU, Lin
TOV, William
TONG, Victor Joo Chuan
Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users
description Using data from 13,789 Facebook users across U.S. states, this study examined the main effects of societal-level cultural tightness–looseness and its interaction effects with individuals’ social network density on impression management (IM) in terms of online emotional expression. Results showed that individuals from culturally tight (vs. loose) states were more likely to express positive emotions and less likely to express negative emotions. Meanwhile, for positive emotional expression, there was a tightness–looseness by social network density interaction effect. In culturally tight states, individuals with dense (vs. sparse) networks were more likely to express positive emotions, while in culturally loose states this pattern was reversed. For negative emotional expression, however, no such interaction was observed. Our findings highlight the influence of cultural norms and social network structure on emotional expressions as IM strategies.
format text
author LIU, Pan
CHAN, David
QIU, Lin
TOV, William
TONG, Victor Joo Chuan
author_facet LIU, Pan
CHAN, David
QIU, Lin
TOV, William
TONG, Victor Joo Chuan
author_sort LIU, Pan
title Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users
title_short Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users
title_full Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users
title_fullStr Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users
title_full_unstemmed Effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: A large-scale study of impression management by Facebook users
title_sort effects of cultural tightness-looseness and social network density on expression of positive and negative emotions: a large-scale study of impression management by facebook users
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2702
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3959/viewcontent/0146167218770999.pdf
_version_ 1770574376920416256