Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being

The present exploratory research examined the possibility that commitment in close relationships among lower class individuals, despite greater strains on those relationships, buffers them from poorer subjective well-being (SWB). In two samples of close relationship dyads, we found that when partner...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TAN, Jacinth J. X., KRAUS, Michael W., IMPETT, Emily A., KELTNER, Dacher
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2820
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4077/viewcontent/Partner_commitment_in_close_relationships_mitigates_social_class_differences_in_subjective_well_being.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4077
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.soss_research-40772020-06-25T01:24:56Z Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being TAN, Jacinth J. X. KRAUS, Michael W. IMPETT, Emily A. KELTNER, Dacher The present exploratory research examined the possibility that commitment in close relationships among lower class individuals, despite greater strains on those relationships, buffers them from poorer subjective well-being (SWB). In two samples of close relationship dyads, we found that when partners reported high commitment to the relationship, the typical deficits in relatively lower class individuals’ well-being compared to their upper-class counterparts, assessed as life satisfaction among romantic couples (Study 1) and negative affect linked to depression among ethnically diverse close friendships (Study 2), were mitigated. Conversely, when partners reported low commitment to the relationship, relatively lower class individuals reported poorer well-being than their upper-class counterparts. These patterns were not found with actors’ commitment. Implications of these findings for upending the class divide in SWB are discussed. 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2820 info:doi/10.1177/1948550619837006 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4077/viewcontent/Partner_commitment_in_close_relationships_mitigates_social_class_differences_in_subjective_well_being.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University social class commitment relationships subjective well-being Applied Behavior Analysis Personality and Social Contexts Social Psychology Social Psychology and Interaction
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic social class
commitment
relationships
subjective well-being
Applied Behavior Analysis
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
Social Psychology and Interaction
spellingShingle social class
commitment
relationships
subjective well-being
Applied Behavior Analysis
Personality and Social Contexts
Social Psychology
Social Psychology and Interaction
TAN, Jacinth J. X.
KRAUS, Michael W.
IMPETT, Emily A.
KELTNER, Dacher
Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
description The present exploratory research examined the possibility that commitment in close relationships among lower class individuals, despite greater strains on those relationships, buffers them from poorer subjective well-being (SWB). In two samples of close relationship dyads, we found that when partners reported high commitment to the relationship, the typical deficits in relatively lower class individuals’ well-being compared to their upper-class counterparts, assessed as life satisfaction among romantic couples (Study 1) and negative affect linked to depression among ethnically diverse close friendships (Study 2), were mitigated. Conversely, when partners reported low commitment to the relationship, relatively lower class individuals reported poorer well-being than their upper-class counterparts. These patterns were not found with actors’ commitment. Implications of these findings for upending the class divide in SWB are discussed.
format text
author TAN, Jacinth J. X.
KRAUS, Michael W.
IMPETT, Emily A.
KELTNER, Dacher
author_facet TAN, Jacinth J. X.
KRAUS, Michael W.
IMPETT, Emily A.
KELTNER, Dacher
author_sort TAN, Jacinth J. X.
title Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
title_short Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
title_full Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
title_fullStr Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
title_full_unstemmed Partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
title_sort partner commitment in close relationships mitigates social-class differences in subjective well-being
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2820
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4077/viewcontent/Partner_commitment_in_close_relationships_mitigates_social_class_differences_in_subjective_well_being.pdf
_version_ 1770574644390133760