A definition of the state
A state is a form of political association, and political association is itself onlyone form of human association. Other associations range from clubs to businessenterprises to churches. Human beings relate to one another, however, not only inassociations but also in other collective arrangements, s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2917 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4174/viewcontent/21.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-4174 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.soss_research-41742019-09-20T03:30:51Z A definition of the state KUKATHAS, Chandran A state is a form of political association, and political association is itself onlyone form of human association. Other associations range from clubs to businessenterprises to churches. Human beings relate to one another, however, not only inassociations but also in other collective arrangements, such as families, neighborhoods,cities, religions, cultures, societies, and nations. The state is not the only form ofpolitical association. Other examples of political associations include townships,counties, provinces, condominiums, territories, confederations, internationalorganisations (such as the UN) and supranational organisations (such as the EU). Todefine the state is to account for the kind of political association it is, and to describeits relation to other forms of human association, and to other kinds of humancollectivity more generally. This is no easy matter for a number of reasons. First, thestate is a form of association with a history, so the entity that is to be described is onethat has evolved or developed and, thus, cannot readily be captured in a snapshot.Second, the concept of the state itself has a history, so any invocation of the term willhave to deal with the fact that it has been used in subtly different ways. Third, not allthe entities that claim to be, or are recognised as, states are the same kinds of entity,since they vary in size, longevity, power, political organisation and legitimacy. Fourth,because the state is a political entity, any account of it must deploy normative concepts– such as legitimacy – that are themselves as contentious as the notion of the state.Although the state is not uniquely difficult to define, these problems need to beacknowledged. 2014-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2917 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4174/viewcontent/21.pdf Research Collection School of Social Sciences eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Political Science Political Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Political Science Political Theory |
spellingShingle |
Political Science Political Theory KUKATHAS, Chandran A definition of the state |
description |
A state is a form of political association, and political association is itself onlyone form of human association. Other associations range from clubs to businessenterprises to churches. Human beings relate to one another, however, not only inassociations but also in other collective arrangements, such as families, neighborhoods,cities, religions, cultures, societies, and nations. The state is not the only form ofpolitical association. Other examples of political associations include townships,counties, provinces, condominiums, territories, confederations, internationalorganisations (such as the UN) and supranational organisations (such as the EU). Todefine the state is to account for the kind of political association it is, and to describeits relation to other forms of human association, and to other kinds of humancollectivity more generally. This is no easy matter for a number of reasons. First, thestate is a form of association with a history, so the entity that is to be described is onethat has evolved or developed and, thus, cannot readily be captured in a snapshot.Second, the concept of the state itself has a history, so any invocation of the term willhave to deal with the fact that it has been used in subtly different ways. Third, not allthe entities that claim to be, or are recognised as, states are the same kinds of entity,since they vary in size, longevity, power, political organisation and legitimacy. Fourth,because the state is a political entity, any account of it must deploy normative concepts– such as legitimacy – that are themselves as contentious as the notion of the state.Although the state is not uniquely difficult to define, these problems need to beacknowledged. |
format |
text |
author |
KUKATHAS, Chandran |
author_facet |
KUKATHAS, Chandran |
author_sort |
KUKATHAS, Chandran |
title |
A definition of the state |
title_short |
A definition of the state |
title_full |
A definition of the state |
title_fullStr |
A definition of the state |
title_full_unstemmed |
A definition of the state |
title_sort |
definition of the state |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2917 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/4174/viewcontent/21.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574749756293120 |